Semi-automatic thresholding using the full-width at half-maximum criterion for CE-MRI accurately measured myocardial infarct size, correlating highly with postmortem pathology (r2=0.94, p<0.001).
Does semi-automatic thresholding using FWHM on CE-MRI accurately measure myocardial infarct size compared to postmortem pathology in a canine model?
Semi-automatic thresholding using the full-width at half-maximum criterion on CE-MRI provides accurate and objective infarct sizing up to 30 minutes after contrast administration in a canine model.
Estimación del efecto: r2 = 0.94
valor p: p=<0.001
OBJECTIVES: To identify an accurate and reproducible method to define myocardial infarct (MI) size, we conducted a study in a closed-chest canine model of acute myocardial infarction, in which MI size was measured using different thresholding techniques and by imaging at different delay times after contrast administration. BACKGROUND: The MI size by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) is directly related to long-term prognosis. However, previous measurements were done using nonuniform methods and tended to overestimate nonviable areas. METHODS: Thirteen animals underwent 90 min of coronary artery occlusion, followed by reperfusion. The CE-MRI data were acquired within 24 h after reperfusion and compared with triphenyltetrazolium chloride pathology. In the first nine animals, images were obtained approximately 15 min after gadolinium diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-DTPA) using an inversion-recovery gradient-echo pulse sequence. To identify the most accurate method, MI size by CE-MRI was measured visually and by semi-automatic thresholding techniques, using different criteria. In four additional animals, images were acquired every 6 min until 30 min after Gd-DTPA. RESULTS: Postmortem MI size was 13.5 +/- 2.6% of left ventricular volume. Semi-automatic techniques, using full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) criterion, correlated best with postmortem data (r(2) = 0.94, p < 0.001; results confirmed by Bland-Altman plots). Using FWHM, there was no difference in MI size between different delay times after contrast (15.2 +/- 2.9% to 14.5 +/- 4.2% at 6 and 30 min, respectively; p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: When an objective technique is used to define MI size by CE-MRI, accurate infarct size measurements can be obtained from images obtained up to 30 min after contrast administration.
Amado et al. (Wed,) conducted a other in Acute myocardial infarction (n=13). Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) vs. Triphenyltetrazolium chloride pathology was evaluated on Correlation of MI size by CE-MRI with postmortem data (r2 = 0.94, p=<0.001). Semi-automatic thresholding using the full-width at half-maximum criterion for CE-MRI accurately measured myocardial infarct size, correlating highly with postmortem pathology (r2=0.94, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: