PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 10, 2025Frontiers in Psychology1 citationsOpen Access

Development and validation of the socially shared regulated learning questionnaire: insights from a second-order confirmatory factor analysis

View Full Paper
YYYongkang YangZHZhi-Xu HeYWYinuo Wei

Key Points

  • The results showed excellent internal consistency with ω values ≥ 0.82 across all dimensions of the SSRL questionnaire.
  • Robust model fit was confirmed with a CFI of 0.951, RMSEA of 0.050, and SRMR of 0.038, affirming its structural validity.
  • A think-aloud protocol was employed in the first phase to refine the questionnaire items with diverse university students.
  • This validated SSRL questionnaire provides an effective, scalable tool for educators to assess collaborative regulation processes.

Abstract

This study addresses a critical methodological gap by developing and validating a psychometrically robust, multidimensional socially shared regulated learning (SSRL) questionnaire. Grounded in contemporary theories of collaborative learning and regulation, the questionnaire comprises four theoretically informed dimensions: Shared Goal Setting and Planning, Shared Monitoring and Control, Shared Reflection and Evaluation, and Shared Motivational and Emotional Regulation. Employing a two-phase methodological design, the study first refined questionnaire items through a think-aloud protocol (TAP) with a diverse student sample. Subsequently, the refined instrument was administered to 378 university students, and its structural validity and reliability were evaluated via second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results demonstrated excellent internal consistency ( ω ≥ 0.82 for all dimensions), robust model fit (CFI = 0.951; RMSEA = 0.050; SRMR = 0.038), and strong hierarchical relationships between dimensions and the overarching SSRL construct. This validated questionnaire provides educators and researchers with an effective, scalable tool for assessing collaborative regulation processes, thus offering insights into enhancing collaborative learning outcomes in diverse educational contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68c199da9b7b07f3a061af00https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1635325
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Development and Validation of Socially Shared Regulated Learning Competency Test2026
  2. 2Socially Shared Regulation of Learning as a Foundation for Sustainable Collaborative Practices in Higher Education: Evidence from a Brief Two-Dimensional Model2026
  3. 3Development and validation of Questionnaire for Self-regulated Learning Writing Strategies (QSRLWS) for EFL learners2024 · 17 citations
  4. 4Development and Validation of an Instrument on Self-Regulation Skills (SRS) at the University Level2024
  5. 5Self-regulated and socially shared regulation of learning in adaptive collaborative educational environments: a scoping review2026