PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 26, 2025Journal of Clinical Medicine2 citationsOpen Access

Sex Differences in Predictors of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Risk Among Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Colombian University Students

View Full Paper
JAJuan Alberto Aristizábal-HoyosOSOlga Patricia López SotoHFHéctor Fuentes-Barría

Key Points

  • Males had significantly higher OSA risk at 23% versus 3.1% for females, highlighting sex differences in prevalence.
  • Significant predictors included neck circumference and Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores across both sexes, indicating risk factors.
  • This cross-sectional study among 340 university students assessed various anatomical features to determine OSA risk predictors.
  • Results suggest targeted prevention for OSA may improve by employing sex-specific screening approaches in healthcare settings.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to identify anatomical and clinical predictors of moderate to high Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) risk in a sample of university students, with an emphasis on sex-based differences. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 340 university students (148 males, 192 females) in Manizales, Colombia. Anthropometric measurements, anatomical features (neck circumference, Mallampati index, facial profile, molar Angle classification), and validated screening tools (STOP-BANG, Epworth Sleepiness Scale) were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied globally and stratified by sex to determine predictors of moderate/high OSA risk (STOP-BANG ≥ 3). Results: Males had significantly higher STOP-BANG scores, neck circumference, and prevalence of moderate/high OSA risk (23% vs. 3.1%), while females showed higher daytime sleepiness (p < 0.001). In the global model, neck circumference (OR = 0.57, p < 0.001) and Epworth score (OR = 0.86, p = 0.01) were significant predictors. In men, neck circumference (OR = 0.62, p < 0.001) and Angle’s molar classification (OR = 0.54, p = 0.04) were associated with risk. In women, neck circumference (OR = 0.35, p = 0.01) and daytime sleepiness (OR = 0.60, p = 0.03) remained significant. Conclusions: Easily accessible anatomical and clinical markers can help identify young adults at risk for OSA. Sex-specific screening approaches may enhance early detection strategies in university populations. Implementing these tools in clinical and educational settings may improve targeted prevention, facilitate timely referral to sleep specialists, and potentially reduce long-term health complications associated with undiagnosed OSA in emerging adults.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aristizábal-Hoyos et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6c687b1249cec298b2bcahttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196738
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Sex differences in cardiovascular disease and biomarkers in obstructive sleep apnea2025
  2. 2PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL PROFILE OF OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA IN A POPULATION OF YOUNG ADULTS2026
  3. 3Prevalence of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea among College going Students: A Study Protocol2025
  4. 4Prevalence and predictors of obstructive sleep apnea in men and women from an outpatient clinic cohort: Focus on clinical characteristics, cardiovascular disease and serum biomarkers2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Sex-Specific Characteristics of Anthropometry in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea2014 · 73 citations