PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 15, 2024Biofabrication51 citations

A practical machine learning approach for predicting the quality of 3D (bio)printed scaffolds

View Full Paper
SRSaeed RafieyanEAElham AnsariEVEbrahim Vasheghani‐Farahani

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract 3D (Bio)printing is a highly effective method for fabricating tissue engineering scaffolds, renowned for their exceptional precision and control. Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a crucial technology in this field, capable of learning and replicating complex patterns that surpass human capabilities. However, the integration of AI in tissue engineering is often hampered by the lack of comprehensive and reliable data. This study addresses these challenges by providing one of the most extensive datasets on 3D-printed scaffolds. It provides the most comprehensive open-source dataset and employs various AI techniques, from unsupervised to supervised learning. This dataset includes detailed information on 1171 scaffolds, featuring a variety of biomaterials and concentrations—including 60 biomaterials such as natural and synthesized biomaterials, crosslinkers, enzymes, etc.—along with 49 cell lines, cell densities, and different printing conditions. We used over 40 machine learning and deep learning algorithms, tuning their hyperparameters to reveal hidden patterns and predict cell response, printability, and scaffold quality. The clustering analysis using KMeans identified five distinct ones. In classification tasks, algorithms such as XGBoost, Gradient Boosting, Extra Trees Classifier, Random Forest Classifier, and LightGBM demonstrated superior performance, achieving higher accuracy and F1 scores. A fully connected neural network with six hidden layers from scratch was developed, precisely tuning its hyperparameters for accurate predictions. The developed dataset and the associated code are publicly available on https://github.com/saeedrafieyan/MLATE to promote future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rafieyan et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60357b6db643587596c26https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ad6374
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Three-dimensional bioprinting of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)2018 · 209 citations
  2. 2Natural Polymers for Organ 3D Bioprinting2018 · 167 citations
  3. 33D bioprinting of liver-mimetic construct with alginate/cellulose nanocrystal hybrid bioink2017 · 205 citations
  4. 4Optimization of 3D Printing Parameters on Deformation by BP Neural Network Algorithm2022 · 15 citations
  5. 5An AI Approach to Identifying Novel Therapeutics for Rheumatoid Arthritis2023 · 8 citations