PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 11, 2024Novum Testamentum0 citationsOpen Access

Textual Criticism in the Gaps

View Full Paper
JMJoey McCollum

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract This article concerns the likelihoods of competing textual reconstructions in the Chester Beatty Papyrus 𝔓⁴⁶ based on the available space in its lacunose lines. To quantify these relative probabilities, the author uses statistical models of line lengths in 𝔓⁴⁶ and a recently described technique for calculating the likelihood of a reconstructed lacunose text. He first demonstrates the power and versatility of this approach with examples in Gal 4:17 and 3:1. He then revisits two more contested textual reconstructions proposed for 𝔓⁴⁶: the absence of τῷ θεῷ in Heb 11:4, suggested by G.D. Kilpatrick in 1941, and the absence of σὺν ἐπισκόποις καὶ διακόνοις in Phil 1:1, suggested by T.C. Skeat in 1995. He shows that Kilpatrick’s proposed shorter reading in 𝔓⁴⁶ is six times more likely than the longer reading in Heb 11:4, while the evidence is not decisive between the readings in Phil 1:1.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Joey McCollum (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e74ba6b6db6435876c48d6https://doi.org/10.1163/15685365-bja10066
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper