PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 19, 2025Frontiers in Public Health1 citationsOpen Access

The effect of complex training and ballistic exercise on the time-course adaptations of lower extremity explosive strength in elite female field hockey players

View Full Paper
SWShuo WangXJXianglong JiangZCZitong Chen

Key Points

  • Ballistic exercise results in significant short-term gains in explosive strength but plateaus after four weeks.
  • Complex training shows continued improvements in explosive strength, outperforming ballistic exercise in 1RM by week eight.
  • Participants underwent three training sessions per week over eight weeks, with assessments at baseline, week 4, and week 8.
  • Findings suggest ballistic exercise is best for pre-competition phases, while complex training is better for longer-term strength development.

Abstract

Objective To compare the short- and long-term effects of complex training (CT) and ballistic exercise (BE) on lower-limb explosive performance in elite female hockey players and to identify temporal adaptation patterns. Methods Twenty-four athletes were randomized to CT ( n = 8), BE ( n = 8), or control (CG, n = 8). Interventions lasted 8 weeks (3 sessions/week). Performance outcomes included countermovement jump (CMJ), 30-m sprint, and squat 1RM, assessed at baseline, week 4, and week 8. Results At week 4, the BE group improved CMJ ( p 0.01, d = 1.85), sprint ( p 0.01, d = 0.90), and 1RM ( p 0.05, d = 0.39), with no further gains by week 8 ( p 0.05). The CT group improved sprint ( p 0.01, d = 0.60) and 1RM ( p 0.01, d = 0.92) at week 4, while CMJ remained unchanged. By week 8, CT demonstrated significant improvements in CMJ ( p 0.05, d = 1.24), additional sprint gains ( p 0.01, d = 0.51), and continued 1RM increases ( p 0.01, d = 1.72). The CG declined in CMJ ( p 0.05, d = 0.44) and 1RM ( p 0.01, d = 1.03), with no sprint changes. Between groups, BE outperformed CG in CMJ at week 4 ( p 0.05). At week 8, both CT ( p 0.01) and BE ( p 0.05) exceeded CG in CMJ; sprint favored CT and BE over CG ( p 0.05); and 1RM favored CT over BE ( p 0.05) and CG ( p 0.01). Conclusion BE induces rapid short-term improvements in jumping and sprinting but plateaus after 4 weeks. CT produces slower yet sustained gains across all indicators by 8 weeks, with superior strength development. BE is suited for pre-competition phases, whereas CT is preferable during preparatory periods for integrated strength–power adaptation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f43f03854d1061a58ac51dhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1676079
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper