PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 16, 2026Processes0 citationsOpen Access

Anomalous Shale Oil Flow in Nanochannels: Perspective from Nanofluidic Experiments

View Full Paper
CDChuang DongYLYaxiong LiXLXinrui Lyu

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the flow behavior of shale oil in nanopores and the challenges posed by nanoconfinement.
  • Conducting nanofluidic experiments in channels of varying pore sizes (100, 200, 300 nm)
  • Measuring displacement distances of shale oil under specific temperature and pressure conditions
  • Incorporating an equivalent resistance coefficient into flow models for data fitting
  • Displacement distances of shale oil varied significantly with pore size, showing non-linear flow behavior
  • The equivalent resistance coefficient increases with decreasing pore size but decreases with rising temperature and pressure
  • Even under high conditions, shale oil flow does not completely return to ideal Darcy behavior

Abstract

Shale oil is primarily hosted within nanopores, where its flow behavior exhibits significant deviations from classical Darcy flow. The combined influences of nanoscale confinement and interfacial interactions represent key scientific challenges that hinder efficient shale oil recovery. The results show that under 25 °C and 1 MPa, the displacement distances of shale oil within 12 s in 100, 200, and 300 nm channels were 2.88, 5.67, and 11.01 mm, respectively. As pore size decreases, flow capacity drops sharply, and the displacement–time relationship evolves from quasi-linear to strongly nonlinear, indicating pronounced nanoscale non-Darcy behavior. By incorporating an equivalent resistance coefficient into the plate-channel flow model, the experimental data were accurately fitted, enabling quantitative evaluation of the additional flow resistance induced by nanoconfinement and interfacial adsorption. The equivalent resistance coefficient increases markedly with decreasing pore size but decreases progressively with increasing temperature and driving pressure. Increasing temperature and pressure partially mitigates nanoconfinement effects. In 200 nm channels, the equivalent resistance coefficient decreases from 1.87 to 1.20 as temperature rises from 25 to 80 °C, while in 100 nm channels it decreases from 2.43 to 1.65 as driving pressure increases from 1 to 6 MPa. Nevertheless, even under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions, shale-oil flow does not fully recover to ideal Darcy behavior. This work establishes a nanofluidic-based prediction and evaluation framework for shale oil flow, offering theoretical guidance and experimental reference for unconventional reservoir development and the optimization of enhanced oil recovery strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6969d4a2940543b977709924https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14020292
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Fluid Flow Behavior in Nanometer-Scale Pores and Its Impact on Shale Oil Recovery Efficiency2024 · 9 citations
  2. 2Investigating the flow behaviors of multi-component oil in shale nanopores via MD simulations2026
  3. 3Adsorption–flow coupling model for quantifying the transport mechanism of shale oil under nanoconfinement effects2025
  4. 4Shale Oil Transport in Kerogen Nanopores by Molecular Dynamics Simulation: Coupled Effects of Nanoconfinement and Thermodynamics2026
  5. 5The Effect of Solid-Liquid Interfacial Interactions on Shale Oil Flow in the Micro-Nano Scale Porous Media2026