PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 21, 2026Australasian Journal on Ageing0 citationsOpen Access

LGBTIQA + Inclusion in Aged Care: Perspectives From Providers and Community Stakeholders

View Full Paper
DTDaniel TissotSKSara KaracsonySASharon Andrews

Key Points

  • The study aims to examine the perspectives of aged care providers and community stakeholders regarding the implementation of culturally safe care for older LGBTIQA+ Australians.
  • Employing an interpretive descriptive methodology
  • Conducting thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke's framework
  • Analyzing transcripts from the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety Diversity Hearing
  • Identified two main themes: Inclusive and Culturally Safe Care, and Robust Governance for Inclusive Care.
  • Found significant distrust in formal services and systemic barriers due to historical trauma.
  • Highlighted the necessity for mandatory LGBTIQA+ workforce training and improved advocacy for cultural safety.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives Experiences across aged care services for older LGBTIQA+ individuals vary, with some receiving affirming care and others having unmet needs. Given the growing demand from this population, it is essential to examine both effective care aspects and ongoing challenges. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of aged care providers, carers and community stakeholders on opportunities and barriers to the consistent implementation of culturally safe care for older LGBTIQA+ Australians. Methods Adopting an interpretive descriptive methodology, a thematic analysis using Braun and Clarke's six‐step framework was conducted on LGBTIQA+‐specific transcripts from the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety Diversity Hearing (October 2019) in Melbourne, Australia. Results Thematic analysis identified two main themes: Inclusive and Culturally Safe Care and Robust Governance for Inclusive Care. Findings revealed that engagement with aged care is severely undermined by historical trauma and a profound mistrust of formal services by some LGBTQIA+ older people. Systemic barriers persisted due to inconsistencies in governance and a lack of accountability for diversity standards. Stakeholders highlighted the critical necessity of mandatory, identity‐affirming LGBTIQA+ workforce training and the vital role of advocacy and community connections in bridging access gaps and ensuring cultural safety. Conclusions While policy frameworks and ‘special needs’ recognition exist, genuine inclusion for older LGBTIQA+ Australians hinges on operationalising cultural safety through consistent governance, stronger compliance mechanisms and a mandatory, well‐resourced training regimen for the aged care workforce. These findings provide critical implications for policy reform and practice improvement under Australia's evolving aged care standards.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tissot et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69706c09b6488063ad5c1828https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.70129
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1LGBT+ concerns of ageing and accessing aged care services in Australia: A cross‐sectional study2025
  2. 2“A little bit of masking tape and a lot of glitter”: Perspectives of older LGBT+ Australians on navigating aged care2026
  3. 3“We Have a Long Way to Go”: Palliative Care Clinicians’ Reflections on Inclusive care for LGBTQI+ Older Adult Patients and Care Partners2025
  4. 4Aged and Health Care Service Use by Older Australians Who Identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex or Gender Diverse: A Retrospective Cohort Study.2026
  5. 5Institutional policy gaps in long-term care: Supporting LGBTQ residents in Northwestern Ontario2026