Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 7, 2011CirculationOpen Access

Plaque disruption was observed in 38% of women with myocardial infarction but no obstructive coronary artery disease, indicating alternate mechanisms of injury.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Population

Women ≥18 years of age presenting with acute myocardial infarction without angiographically obstructive…

Design

Cohort, Core laboratory blinded to clinical, ECG, laboratory, angiographic…

Key result

Plaque disruption was observed in 38% of women with myocardial infarction but no obstructive coronary artery disease, indicating alternate mechanisms of injury.

Authors

HRHarmony R. ReynoldsMSMonvadi B. SrichaiSISohah N. Iqbal

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports intravascular imaging for plaque disruption in women with MI and nonobstructive CAD; leaves open effects on management.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Women ≥18 years of age presenting with acute myocardial infarction without angiographically obstructive coronary artery disease (no lesion with ≥50% diameter stenosis)
I
Intervention
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)
O
Outcome
Mechanisms of myocardial infarction (plaque disruption on IVUS, late gadolinium enhancement or T2 signal hyperintensity on CMR)surrogate

In women with myocardial infarction and no obstructive coronary artery disease, plaque disruption and ischemic myocardial injury are common mechanisms identified by IVUS and CMR.

Cite This Study

Reynolds et al. (2011) studied this question. Plaque disruption was observed in 38% of women with myocardial infarction but no obstructive coronary artery disease, indicating alternate mechanisms of injury.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69813047229fc2169ebc21f8https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.026542
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share