PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026IET Software0 citationsOpen Access

A Structured Lifecycle Model for Quantum Software Engineering: Bridging Technical Challenges and Future Directions

View Full Paper
HAHessa AlfraihiIZIslam ZadaMAMahmoud Ahmed

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a structured lifecycle model to enhance quantum software engineering practices.
  • Proposed a structured QSE lifecycle with six development phases.
  • Integrated quantum-specific characteristics with standard software engineering principles.
  • Validated through expert assessment and simulation with variational quantum algorithms.
  • Improved fidelity convergence of quantum algorithms.
  • Reduced resource overhead in software development.
  • Enhanced development stability and reliability of validation compared to unstructured workflows.

Abstract

Quantum computing is one of the research areas progressing rapidly toward practical deployment, yet the engineering of scalable and reliable quantum software remains underdeveloped. Current quantum software engineering (QSE) practices are largely tools‐driven and ad hoc that providing limited support for managing probabilistic execution, hybrid quantum–classical workflows, noise sensitivity, and hardware constraints. This study proposed a structured QSE lifecycle that integrates quantum‐specific characteristics with disciplined software engineering practices and principles. The proposed lifecycle organizes development into six phases, encompassing quantum requirements engineering, formal modeling, architecture and circuit design, hybrid integration, noise‐aware testing, and deployment with monitoring. Each phase is supported by explicit artifacts and quantitative criteria to enable systematic progression and iterative refinement. The QSE is validated through expert assessment and simulation‐based experimentation using representative variational quantum algorithms under the realistic noise conditions. The results show improved fidelity convergence, reduced resource overhead, enhanced development stability (DS), and more reliable validation compared with unstructured workflows, demonstrating the value of lifecycle‐driven engineering for quantum software systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alfraihi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434f9f1d9ada3c1fb3badhttps://doi.org/10.1049/sfw2/7827044
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper