PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2026The Journal of Cell Biology2 citations

Better reporting is better science: Community-defined minimal reporting requirements for light microscopy

View Full Paper
PLPaula Montero LlopisCOChloë van Oostende-TripletNGNathalie Gaudreault

Key Points

  • The aim is to establish minimal reporting requirements for microscopy techniques to enhance data transparency and reproducibility.
  • Developed a minimal microscopy reporting requirements checklist.
  • Integrated both human- and machine-readable formats for usability.
  • Sought community input to ensure guidelines address common practices.
  • Introduced a checklist that enhances clarity in reporting microscopy methods.
  • Facilitated actionable guidance for researchers and publishers.
  • Promoted community standards that could potentially improve reproducibility in science.

Abstract

Incomplete reporting of microscopy methods undermines transparency, reproducibility, and data reuse. Despite recent initiatives, comprehensive, broadly endorsed, and accessible reporting guidelines are still lacking. Here, we present a bare minimal microscopy reporting requirements checklist that integrates human- and machine-readable input to provide clear, actionable guidance for researchers, reviewers, and publishers and to advance community standards in microscopy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Llopis et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a1353eed1d949a99abee68https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202601032
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper