PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Structural Differentiation Cosmology (SDC): Observational Decision Framework

View Full Paper
KOKoji Okino

Key Points

  • This work aims to define an observational criterion to differentiate between SDC and the ΛCDM model regarding cosmic acceleration.
  • Developed a decision framework based on geometric and growth relations
  • Outlined the central geometry–growth relation H(z) and fσ₈(z)
  • Established falsification conditions for SDC
  • Predicted systematic deviations in the geometry–growth relation under SDC
  • Outlined conditions under which SDC can be confirmed or rejected
  • Identified key observational programs such as DESI and Euclid for future tests

Abstract

This paper presents version 2.0 of Structural Differentiation Cosmology (SDC), focusing on an observational decision framework designed to distinguish SDC from the standard ΛCDM cosmological model. Rather than introducing new physical components such as dark energy, SDC interprets the observed cosmic acceleration as an observational projection of irreversible internal structural differentiation in a closed universe. The purpose of this document is not to provide a complete cosmological model, but to define a minimal and falsifiable observational criterion capable of discriminating between two interpretations of cosmic acceleration: • ΛCDM: acceleration driven by dark energy • SDC: acceleration arising as a projection of internal structural differentiation The central discriminator is the geometry–growth relation between the expansion history H(z) and the growth observable fσ₈(z). In ΛCDM these quantities follow a single trajectory, while SDC predicts systematic deviations caused by projection effects. A conceptual geometry–growth plane is presented to illustrate how future observations may distinguish these two frameworks. This work explicitly defines falsification conditions. If observations fail to satisfy the predicted criterion, SDC is rejected. The goal of this framework is therefore not to protect a model, but to state clearly where observations may confirm or refuse it. Relevant observational programs include: DESI Euclid Roman Space Telescope CMB-S4 This document serves as an observational decision framework for evaluating whether cosmic acceleration should be interpreted as a physical expansion component or as a structural projection phenomenon.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koji Okino (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69b4fbb1b39f7826a300c150https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18976941
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper