PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 21, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Black Hole Uniqueness, Re-emergence, and the Recovery of Information: A CL5D Hybrid Model Analysis

View Full Paper
MCMrinmoy Chakraborty

Key Points

  • The study aims to resolve the black hole information paradox by examining uniqueness, re-emergence, and quantum information recovery.
  • Utilized the CL5D Hybrid Model, a multi-phase mathematical framework.
  • Defined Benchmark Scores based on physical parameters of black holes.
  • Proposed three main propositions and provided proofs for each.
  • Identical black holes producing varying Benchmark Scores disproves the No-Hair Theorem at the CL5D level.
  • Tunneling amplitude found analytically identical to Hawking emission rate.
  • Page curve reproduction demonstrated through specific model parameters.

Abstract

The black hole information paradox has persisted as one of the most consequentialunresolved problems at the intersection of quantum mechanics and general relativity.This paper applies the CL5D Hybrid Model — a deterministic multi-phase mathematicalframework (Papers 1–7, Chakraborty, 2026) — to address three interrelatedopen problems: (i) whether distinct black holes possess unique physical identitiesbeyond the classical parameters of mass, charge, and spin prescribed by the No-HairTheorem (NHT); (ii) whether a black hole can undergo a re-emergence transitionanalogous to Phase IV in the CL5D phase taxonomy; and (iii) the mechanism bywhich quantum information is recovered during black hole evaporation, as describedby the Page curve. We apply the same Benchmark Score formulation used in Papers6 and 7 to define BS,BH as a function of the Fractal Heterogeneity Coefficient α andthe skewness and kurtosis of the black hole’s micro-event phase space. Three Propositionsare stated, each followed by a Proof of Concept. Proposition 1 establishes thatfive black holes with identical (M, Q, J) but different formation histories produceBenchmark Scores ranging from BS = 0.12 to BS = 0.99, directly disproving physicalidentity at the CL5D level. Proposition 2 demonstrates that the CL5D tunnellingamplitude Etunnel = ECt · e−2κd is analytically identical to the Hawking emissionrate with residual below machine precision. Proposition 3 shows that the CL5DEvolution set → Decay set transition at the Conjugate Balance point reproducesthe Page curve exactly, with the parameter α controlling the Page time. JWSTobservational data — Little Red Dots and the Virgil galaxy in the El Gordo cluster— provide empirical anchors consistent with elevated-α black hole populations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mrinmoy Chakraborty (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69be36416e48c4981c675110https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19080538
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1BLACK HOLES A Consistent Effective Model Derived from Planckon-Based Cubic Structural Phase Theory and the ΨD Framework2026
  2. 2Supplement — Singularity Information Event Horizon: The Event Horizon as Geometric Phase Transition: Information Preservation, Topological Hair2026
  3. 3BLACK HOLES Local Return in the ΨD Framework: the Planckon Core, Nonsingularity, and the Remnant Theorem2026
  4. 4The Topological Page Curve and Fast Scrambling of Information in QGEFT Black Holes2026
  5. 5Black Holes as Horizon-Mediated Transformers of Realised Physical Distinguishability in Compact S³ Geometry2026