PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 3, 2026PNAS Nexus0 citationsOpen Access

Fundamental safety-capability trade-offs in fine-tuning large language models

View Full Paper
PCPin-Yu ChenHSHan ShenPDPayel Das

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the relationship between safety and capability when fine-tuning large language models.
  • Developed a theoretical framework to analyze safety-capability trade-offs.
  • Investigated two safety-aware LLM fine-tuning strategies.
  • Examined effects of data similarity and context overlap on safety and capability.
  • Conducted numerical experiments to validate theoretical findings.
  • Identified fundamental limits of safety-capability trade-offs in LLM fine-tuning.
  • Demonstrated that enhancing capability often compromises safety features.
  • Characterized the effects of alignment loss on model performance.

Abstract

Abstract Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) on some task-specific datasets has been a primary use of LLMs. However, it has been empirically observed that this approach to enhancing capability inevitably compromises safety, a phenomenon also known as the safety-capability trade-off in LLM fine-tuning. This paper presents a theoretical framework for understanding the interplay between safety and capability in two primary safety-aware LLM fine-tuning strategies, providing new insights into the effects of data similarity, context overlap, and alignment loss landscape. Our theoretical results characterize the fundamental limits of the safety-capability trade-off in LLM fine-tuning, which are also validated by numerical experiments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69cf5d055a333a821460a90ahttps://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag097
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper