PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 6, 2026History of Science0 citationsOpen Access

Amazonian cosmologies, plant–human relations and the colonial entanglements of Indigenous artifacts

View Full Paper
RURaphael Uchôa

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the relationship between Amazonian artifacts and colonial practices within European museums.
  • Examined collection and curation processes of Amazonian artifacts in European museums.
  • Analyzed Amerindian masks and botanical specimens as case studies.
  • Critiqued Eurocentric interpretations of Indigenous cultures and knowledge.
  • Highlighted the role of colonial expansion in shaping scientific practices.
  • Showed how Indigenous labor was exploited for artifact acquisition and interpretation.
  • Emphasized the need to integrate Indigenous epistemologies into global science histories.

Abstract

This article examines the deep entanglement of Amazonian artifacts housed in European museums, colonial science, and Indigenous cosmologies. By situating specific collection- and curation processes within their historical contexts, it reveals how scientific practices were intricately tied to colonial expansion, functioning as tools to legitimize and sustain European hegemony. Analysis of Amerindian masks and botanical specimens from the Amazon Basin – two distinct yet interrelated sets of Amazonian artifacts currently held in European institutions – highlights how colonial extractive practices, often reliant on Indigenous slave labor, and geopolitical dynamics shaped the acquisition, interpretation, and display of Indigenous materials. The article also critiques how European scholars and political regimes have treated regions such as the Amazon and Africa as interchangeable, enforcing a reductive, hierarchical view of non-European cultures and reducing the diversity of Indigenous societies to objects of control and categorization. By interweaving insights and critiques by Indigenous and Amazonian intellectuals, particularly Yanomami shaman Davi Kopenawa, and drawing on cosmologies of the Rio Negro region, in the Amazon, this study calls for a fundamental reassessment of knowledge-production frameworks shaped by colonialism and scientific exploration. It underscores the inadequacies of Eurocentric approaches and advocates for the transformative potential of Indigenous epistemologies – not as peripheral perspectives, but as foundational contributions that challenge, reshape, and enrich global histories of science.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Raphael Uchôa (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d34e579c07852e0af97e4dhttps://doi.org/10.1177/00732753261423335
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper