PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 7, 2014BMJ10,871 citationsOpen Access

Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide

THTammy HoffmannBond University
Paul Glasziou
Paul GlasziouRoyal Australian College of General Practitioners
IBIsabelle BoutronUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Without a complete published description of interventions, clinicians and patients cannot reliably implement interventions that are shown to be useful, and other researchers cannot replicate or build on research findings. The quality of description of interventions in publications, however, is remarkably poor. To improve the completeness of reporting, and ultimately the replicability, of interventions, an international group of experts and stakeholders developed the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. The process involved a literature review for relevant checklists and research, a Delphi survey of an international panel of experts to guide item selection, and a face to face panel meeting. The resultant 12 item TIDieR checklist (brief name, why, what (materials), what (procedure), who provided, how, where, when and how much, tailoring, modifications, how well (planned), how well (actual)) is an extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement (item 5) and the SPIRIT 2013 statement (item 11). While the emphasis of the checklist is on trials, the guidance is intended to apply across all evaluative study designs. This paper presents the TIDieR checklist and guide, with an explanation and elaboration for each item, and examples of good reporting. The TIDieR checklist and guide should improve the reporting of interventions and make it easier for authors to structure accounts of their interventions, reviewers and editors to assess the descriptions, and readers to use the information.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hoffmann et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d56d3675589c71d767d004https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhancing Treatment Fidelity in Health Behavior Change Studies: Best Practices and Recommendations From the NIH Behavior Change Consortium.2004 · 2,727 citations
  2. 2Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial2013 · 260 citations
  3. 3Effects of Telerehabilitation on Physical Function and Disability for Stroke Patients2012 · 176 citations
  4. 4What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?2008 · 614 citations
  5. 5Oral anticoagulation self-management and management by a specialist anticoagulation clinic: a randomised cross-over comparison2000 · 292 citations