PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2010Judgment and Decision Making3,829 citationsOpen Access

Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk

GPGabriele PaolacciErasmus University RotterdamJCJesse ChandlerUniversity of MichiganPIPanagiotis G. IpeirotisNew York University

Key Points

  • To evaluate the quality of data from Mechanical Turk and its comparison with traditional subject recruitment methods.
  • Analyzed demographic data of Mechanical Turk users
  • Reviewed strengths of Mechanical Turk in subject recruitment
  • Compared effects from Mechanical Turk and traditional pools
  • Mechanical Turk provides comparable data quality to traditional subject pools
  • Subject demographics reveal diversity that enhances generalizability
  • Offers advantages for longitudinal and cross-cultural research designs

Abstract

Abstract Although Mechanical Turk has recently become popular among social scientists as a source of experimental data, doubts may linger about the quality of data provided by subjects recruited from online labor markets. We address these potential concerns by presenting new demographic data about the Mechanical Turk subject population, reviewing the strengths of Mechanical Turk relative to other online and offline methods of recruiting subjects, and comparing the magnitude of effects obtained using Mechanical Turk and traditional subject pools. We further discuss some additional benefits such as the possibility of longitudinal, cross cultural and prescreening designs, and offer some advice on how to best manage a common subject pool.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Paolacci et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d76657d55abd294a48f42ahttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500002205
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper