PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 26, 2013PLoS ONE891 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

NPNikola PanićELEmanuele LeonciniGBGiulio de Belvis

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The endorsement of PRISMA resulted in increase of both quality of reporting and methodological quality. It is advised that an increasing number of medical journals include PRISMA in the instructions for authors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Panić et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8609418b0ca7f91d17d58https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083138
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper