PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 21, 2009British Journal of Social Psychology574 citationsOpen Access

Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model

View Full Paper
LSLinda StegJGJudith de Groot

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This paper examines factors influencing prosocial intentions. On the basis of the norm activation model (NAM), we propose that four variables influence prosocial intentions or behaviours: (1) personal norms (PN), reflecting feelings of moral obligation to engage in prosocial behaviour, (2) awareness of adverse consequences of not acting prosocially, (3) ascription of responsibility for the negative consequences of not acting prosocially, and (4) perceived control over the problems. We conducted a series of experimental studies to examine how the NAM variables are causally related. As hypothesized, problem awareness, responsibility, and outcome efficacy played an important role in the development of PN and various types of prosocial intentions in the social as well as environmental domain.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Steg et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9462e00ab073a27835ba1https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609x477745
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper