PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 14, 2023Nature Medicine326 citationsOpen Access

Dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAFV600E-mutated rare cancers: the phase 2 ROAR trial

VSVivek SubbiahRKRobert J. KreitmanZWZev A. Wainberg

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BRAFV600E alterations are prevalent across multiple tumors. Here we present final efficacy and safety results of a phase 2 basket trial of dabrafenib (BRAF kinase inhibitor) plus trametinib (MEK inhibitor) in eight cohorts of patients with BRAFV600E-mutated advanced rare cancers: anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (n = 36), biliary tract cancer (n = 43), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 1), adenocarcinoma of the small intestine (n = 3), low-grade glioma (n = 13), high-grade glioma (n = 45), hairy cell leukemia (n = 55) and multiple myeloma (n = 19). The primary endpoint of investigator-assessed overall response rate in these cohorts was 56%, 53%, 0%, 67%, 54%, 33%, 89% and 50%, respectively. Secondary endpoints were median duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Median DoR was 14.4 months, 8.9 months, not reached, 7.7 months, not reached, 31.2 months, not reached and 11.1 months, respectively. Median PFS was 6.7 months, 9.0 months, not reached, not evaluable, 9.5 months, 5.5 months, not evaluable and 6.3 months, respectively. Median OS was 14.5 months, 13.5 months, not reached, 21.8 months, not evaluable, 17.6 months, not evaluable and 33.9 months, respectively. The most frequent (≥20% of patients) treatment-related adverse events were pyrexia (40.8%), fatigue (25.7%), chills (25.7%), nausea (23.8%) and rash (20.4%). The encouraging tumor-agnostic activity of dabrafenib plus trametinib suggests that this could be a promising treatment approach for some patients with BRAFV600E-mutated advanced rare cancers. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02034110 .

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Subbiah et al. (2023) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d94d7600ab073a27835ec8https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-023-02321-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)2008 · 30,019 citations
  2. 2The National Comprehensive Cancer Network1998 · 16,882 citations
  3. 3FDA Approval Summary: Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Microsatellite Instability-High Solid Tumors2019 · 1,177 citations
  4. 4MERAIODE: A Redifferentiation Phase II Trial With Trametinib and Dabrafenib Followed by Radioactive Iodine Administration for Metastatic Radioactive Iodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients With a BRAFV600E Mutation (NCT 03244956)2021 · 31 citations
  5. 5Pan-cancer efficacy of pralsetinib in patients with RET fusion–positive solid tumors from the phase 1/2 ARROW trial2022 · 247 citations