PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026Sensors4 citationsOpen Access

Concrete Crack Detection and Classification Methods Based on Machine Vision and Deep Learning

View Full Paper
WCWeibin ChenShenzhen UniversityZPZhijie PengShantou UniversityXCXi ChenSouth China Agricultural University

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop a unified framework for detecting and classifying cracks in structures using advanced machine vision and deep learning techniques.
  • Integration of image preprocessing, feature extraction, model training, and safety assessment
  • Development of an improved OTSU threshold segmentation algorithm for enhanced noise suppression
  • Comparison of SVM, CNN, ResNet-18, and K-means clustering for crack identification and orientation classification
  • Full-scale loading tests on metro shield tunnel segments for experimental validation
  • Improved OTSU method outperformed classical approaches in high- and low-resolution images
  • SVM achieved over 96% accuracy under limited data, reaching 97% after outlier removal
  • ResNet-18 showed strong overall performance but was slightly inferior to SVM with limited training data
  • SVM attained an accuracy of 95.45% in real-world conditions of metro tunnel segments

Abstract

With the rapid development of underground space, structural crack monitoring has become increasingly critical. This study proposes a unified framework integrating image preprocessing, feature extraction, model training, and safety assessment for crack analysis. An improved OTSU threshold segmentation algorithm based on sliding windows and local statistical analysis is developed to enhance noise suppression and detail preservation under complex backgrounds and varying resolutions. For crack identification and orientation classification, SVM, CNN, ResNet-18, and K-means clustering are systematically compared. The results show that the improved OTSU method outperforms the classical approach in both high- and low-resolution images. In classification tasks, SVM achieves the best performance under limited data conditions, with accuracy exceeding 96% and reaching 97% after outlier removal, outperforming CNN, K-means, and ResNet-18. Although ResNet-18 demonstrates strong overall performance with high prediction confidence across crack categories, it remains slightly inferior to SVM when training data are limited. Experimental validation using full-scale loading tests of metro shield tunnel segments further confirms the robustness of the proposed approach, with SVM achieving an accuracy of 95.45% in real-world conditions. This study provides an efficient and reliable solution for automated crack detection and classification in metro tunnel infrastructure and similar underground segment-based systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2c2fe4eeef8a2a6b128fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/s26082381
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Computer vision-based concrete crack detection using U-net fully convolutional networks2019 · 833 citations
  2. 2Concrete Crack Detection by Multiple Sequential Image Filtering2011 · 364 citations
  3. 3Status of tunnelling and underground construction activities and technologies in India2001 · 29 citations
  4. 4Deformation Behavior of a Large-Scale Excavation and the Effect of an Adjacent Foundation Pit on the Excavation2024 · 18 citations
  5. 5Analysis of Edge-Detection Techniques for Crack Identification in Bridges2003 · 890 citations