PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 20260 citations

Exercise as supportive care in advanced cancer-related weight loss: a feasibility study comparing patients with and without severe weight loss.

View Full Paper
CRCindy RichardRPRomane PeyrachonALAstrid Lièvre

Key Points

  • This study aims to determine if severe weight loss affects the efficacy of exercise in advanced cancer patients.
  • Prospective study analyzing a 12-week supervised exercise program.
  • Enrolled 23 patients with BMI-adjusted weight loss grades 3-4.
  • Compared outcomes with matched patients without weight loss.
  • 14 out of 23 patients completed the program with 17.1 sessions attended on average.
  • Intervention led to a +7.06% improvement in endurance (6MWT, p < 0.001).
  • Positive trends in lower limb strength (+2.69 repetitions, p = 0.005) and lean mass (+1.78 kg, p = 0.003) were observed.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer cachexia affects up to 80% of patients with advanced cancer. While exercise has shown benefits for early-stage cancer patients, its role in managing cachexia remains unclear. This study examined whether severe weight loss impedes the benefits of exercise in cancer patients. METHODS: This prospective study analyzed the feasibility and efficacy of a 12-week supervised exercise program in cancer patients with BMI-adjusted weight loss grades 3-4. Feasibility was the primary outcome and was evaluated through attrition, attendance, and safety, while secondary outcomes included changes in nutritional status, physical performance, exercise levels, and fatigue. Outcomes were compared with those of matched cancer patients without advanced BMI-adjusted weight loss who followed the same exercise program. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with BMI-adjusted weight loss grades 3-4 were enrolled and 14 completed the program, attending an average of 17.1 ± 4.3/24 sessions. No adverse events occurred. Intervention improved endurance (+7.06% of theoretical 6MWT distance, p < 0.001). Positive trends emerged for lower limb strength (+2.69 repetitions at 30-s sit-to-stand test, p = 0.005), lean mass (+1.78 kg, p = 0.003), and dietary intake (+ 2.5/10 SEFI, p = 0.003). Functional benefits were also observed in patients without weight loss (n = 14, endurance = +11.33%, lower limb strength = +4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The exercise intervention demonstrated promising efficacy in managing cancer weight loss, providing benefits like those observed in non-cachectic patients, with added gains in nutritional status. While no exercise-related adverse events occurred, feasibility criteria were only partially met due to a higher-than-expected attrition rate. Further research is needed to optimize recruitment strategies, energetic balance, and tailor interventions for this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (Trial registration: NCT06651125).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Richard et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f44464967e944ac5567538https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-10665-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper