PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 9, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Theories of Consciousness: Constraints, Commitments, and Complementarity

View Full Paper
BTBruno Tonetto

Key Points

  • This work examines the relationship between consciousness theories and their ontological commitments, proposing a diagnostic framework.
  • Analysis of contemporary consciousness theories including IIT, Global Workspace Theory, and others.
  • Identification of five recurring structural features across these theories: integration, global accessibility, self-reference, anticipatory modeling, and non-trivial unity.
  • Categorization of theories based on their stance towards structural constraints and metaphysical commitments.
  • Identified five structural features that any complete consciousness framework must accommodate.
  • Demonstrated that the move from brain correlates to brain production is a metaphysical, not an empirical conclusion.
  • Highlighted the potential for ontological portability of structural findings across different theoretical frameworks.

Abstract

Abstract: The apparent conflict between consciousness science and consciousness-first metaphysics is largely an artifact of ontological packaging rather than of the empirical findings themselves. Contemporary theories of consciousness — IIT, Global Workspace, predictive processing, Higher-Order Theories, Recurrent Processing, Attention Schema Theory, Orch OR, and others — each package a structural discovery about consciousness inside an ontological commitment the discovery does not entail. When the two are separated, five recurring structural features emerge across the theory landscape: integration, global accessibility, self-reference, anticipatory modeling, and non-trivial unity. These features describe a single structural territory any complete framework must accommodate, and they are ontologically portable: their predictive content travels across frameworks. Theories fall into three categories — those identifying structural constraints (features any complete framework must accommodate, in the methodological sense used throughout this essay), those denying the explanandum (illusionism and strong deflationary positions), and those relocating the primitive (panpsychism, Russellian monism, cosmopsychism). The diagnostic also makes visible that the production inference — the move from the brain correlates with consciousness to the brain produces consciousness — is a metaphysical commitment rather than an empirical finding. This essay's contribution is the theory-level diagnostic: the structural findings of consciousness science do not entail physicalism, the production inference is commitment rather than finding, and the recurring structural features must be accommodated by any complete framework. Keywords: theories of consciousness · constraint-based reasoning · integrated information theory · global workspace theory · predictive processing · illusionism · panpsychism · ontological portability · production assumption · philosophy of mind Part of the Return to Consciousness research program — 30 philosophical essays exploring consciousness-first metaphysics. Full project: https://returntoconsciousness.org/

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bruno Tonetto (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69fed056b9154b0b82877609https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20074208
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper