PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2025Social Media + Society12 citationsOpen Access

Affective Participation From the In-Between: The Platformization of K-Pop Fandom

View Full Paper
SJSamantha JamesAuburn University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

As K-pop fans around the world participate in their fan communities in hybrid online-offline contexts, their sense of connection with artists and one another is shaped by their unique position in-between co-creators and resistors within the platform ecosystem. This article draws upon 10 months of fieldwork from 2022 to 2023 to offer a framework for how fans navigate platformization and offers a theoretical contribution to platform studies by advancing the theory of affective participation from the in-between. As a process, platformization involves the shifting of everyday experiences from offline interaction to technologically mediated interaction. For K-pop fans, platform infrastructures change participation in the realm of quantification and identification. This project delves into the relationship between K-pop fans and power structures within this contemporary capitalist system. I argue that, although fans work to creatively subvert systems of power within platformization, through navigation practices such as gatekeeping insider knowledge, community policing, and self-cooptation, they reinvent community structuring systems that serve to benefit K-pop industry leaders and platform owners. However, their creative platform use illuminates a potential for affective participation in the in-between —simultaneously subverting and supporting industry expectations. Fans’ unique relationship with industry leaders and one another demonstrate the contradictory textured affective sensations which allow them to participate in fandom in unique ways. By offering this textured approach to affective participation, this article provides meaningful footing for future research on contemporary participation in global platformized contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Samantha James (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a033d4284f5cf1d38754dc7https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251351390
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ordinary Affects2007 · 115 citations
  2. 2“They were having so much fun, so genuinely . . .”: K-pop fan online affect and corroborated authenticity2020 · 67 citations
  3. 3Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide2007 · 5,553 citations
  4. 4Cruel Optimism2011 · 3,795 citations
  5. 5Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact2012 · 3,653 citations