PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 14, 2026Advanced Energy Materials3 citationsOpen Access

Silicon‐Based Anodes for Sulfide Solid‐State Batteries: Failure Mechanisms and Multiscale Design Strategies

View Full Paper
MKM. KaruppaiahJSJaewook SeoSPS.-H. Park

Key Points

  • This review examines silicon-based anodes in solid-state batteries and their failure mechanisms. It aims to propose engineering strategies to mitigate these issues.
  • Comprehensive analysis of silicon anodes paired with sulfide solid electrolytes
  • Discussion of material, electrode, and cell-level engineering strategies
  • Exploration of in situ and operando characterization techniques
  • Identified key failure mechanisms in silicon anodes such as electrochemical degradation and structural pulverization
  • Proposed strategies to enhance ionic conductivity and mitigate interfacial instability
  • Outlined advancements in battery design for improved safety and cycle life

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on silicon (Si)‐based solid‐state batteries (SSBs) has grown rapidly in recent years, drawing considerable attention from the scientific community. Especially, Si‐anodes paired with sulfide solid electrolytes are at the forefront of high‐energy density, offering pathways to enhanced safety and cycle life. Unfortunately, silicon anodes suffer from intrinsically coupled electrochemical degradation and mechanical failure, interfacial instability, and structural pulverization driven by massive volumetric expansion. In this review, we comprehensively examine recent advances in Si‐based anode and propose strategies via material‐, electrode‐, and cell‐level engineering to overcome these obstacles. Furthermore, we also briefly discuss sulfide solid‐electrolyte types, intrinsic limitations, strategies to improve their ionic conductivity, and scalable methods for mass production and low cost. This review also explores cathode pairing, intrinsic material, and interfacial limitations with sulfide electrolytes, and highlights the development of high‐voltage, high‐mass‐loading cathodes compatible with Si anodes. Finally, in situ and operando characterization techniques are highlighted for their critical role in elucidating failure mechanisms and guiding rational electrode and interface design. The highlighted research priorities serve as a roadmap, offering insights to support continued exploration and advancement in this dynamic area.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Karuppaiah et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a05677ca550a87e60a1f85chttps://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.71065
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Decoupling Chemo‐Mechanical Degradation for Scalable Silicon‐Based Solid‐State Batteries2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Silicon-based anodes for solid-state batteries: challenges, opportunities, and multiscale strategies2025 · 12 citations
  3. 3Silicon-carbon anodes for solid‑state batteries: Challenges, optimization strategies, and future perspectives2026
  4. 4Sulfide All-Solid-State Batteries: Interfacial Challenges and High-Energy Architecture Design2025
  5. 5Recent Progress of In‐Depth Analysis Techniques for Si Anodes in Sulfide‐Based All‐Solid‐State Batteries: A Concise Overview and Future Perspective2024 · 1 citations