PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 15, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Synthesis, characterization, and anticancer potency of sulfadiazine salicylaldehyde-based Schiff bases

ENEsraa NasrAMAhmed H. MoustafaAEAshraf S. A. El‐Sayed

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate the synthesis, characterization, and anticancer activity of specific Schiff bases derived from sulfadiazine and salicylaldehyde.
  • Synthesis and characterization of Schiff bases SB1 and SB2 using FTIR and NMR techniques.
  • Cytotoxicity evaluation against human cancer cells (HCT116, MCF-7, A549, HepG2, T24) using MTT assay.
  • Molecular docking studies to predict interactions with target proteins involved in cancer progression.
  • SB1 showed the strongest antiproliferative effect on MCF-7 (IC50 = 66.27 ± 1.14 µg/mL).
  • SB2 exhibited the highest activity against MCF-7 (IC50 = 59.61 ± 1.59 µg/mL) and notable effects on other cancer cells.
  • Both compounds induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in cancer cells, with strong binding affinities noted in molecular docking studies.

Abstract

Abstract Cancer is a major worldwide health issue, with rising prevalence and limitations to traditional chemotherapy demanding the development of innovative, selective anticancer drugs. Schiff bases have emerged as promising candidates due to their diverse biological and anticancer activities. The present study aims to emphasize the chemical identity and anticancer activity of (E)-4-(2-hydroxybenzylideneamino)-N-(pyrimidin-2-yl) benzene-sulfonamide; SB1 and 4-(5-bromo-2-hydroxybenzylideneamino)-N-(pyrimidin-2-yl)-benzenesulfonamide); SB2. The structural identity was determined by FTIR 460 PLUS and 1 H NMR spectra. The cytotoxicity of SB1 and SB2 were evaluated using MTT against various human cancer cells including HCT116, MCF-7, A549, HepG2, T24 compared to WI-38 cells. Additional further studies on MCF-7 and HCT116 cells, including Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection, ROS generation, DNA fragmentation, and Topoisomerase I and II inhibition, were carried out to clarify their modes of action. Molecular docking studies were performed to predict how the produced compounds attached to certain target proteins linked to cancer, shedding light on their putative molecular mechanisms of action. The results showed that the IC 50 of MCF-7, treated with SB1, exhibited the strongest antiproliferative effect (66.27 ± 1.14 µg/mL), followed by HCT116 (90.01 ± 0.12 µg/mL), A549 cells (91.5 ± 2.06 µg/mL), T24 (192.28 ± 1.12 µg/mL), and HepG-2 cells (240.08 ± 3.83 µg/mL). Furthermore, SB2 had the highest antiproliferative activity of MCF-7 (59.61 ± 1.59 µg/mL), followed by HCT116 (48.65 ± 2.12 µg/mL), A549 cells (68.56 ± 1.6 µg/mL), T24 (216.13 ± 0.7 µg/mL), and HepG-2 cells (120.53 ± 2.62 µg/mL). Moreover, SB1 and SB2 cause oxidative stress and apoptosis in cancer cells compared to the control. The molecular docking results showed that the Schiff bases have strong in vitro antineoplastic action and have high binding affinities for key proteins involved in cancer progression. These findings highlight the value of these two compounds of Schiff base derivatives as lead molecules in the development of tailored anticancer drugs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nasr et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b928e7dec685947abca9https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-51752-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper