PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 2, 2008Circulation324 citationsOpen Access

Hot Flashes and Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease

RTRebecca C. ThurstonKSKim Sutton-TyrrellSESusan A. Everson‐Rose

Key Result

Menopausal hot flashes were associated with significantly lower flow-mediated dilation (β=-0.97; P=0.03) and greater aortic calcification (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.07-2.49) in midlife women.

Key Points

  • To examine the relationship between menopausal hot flashes and subclinical cardiovascular disease markers, specifically flow-mediated dilation and vascular calcification.
  • Cross-sectional evaluation of 492 women aged 45 to 58 years (35% Black, 65% White) free of clinical cardiovascular disease enrolled in the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation Heart Study (2001–2003).
  • Brachial artery ultrasound evaluated flow-mediated dilation, electron beam tomography measured coronary artery and aortic calcification, and blood samples provided serum estradiol levels alongside self-reported hot flashes (past 2 weeks).
  • Multivariable linear regression and partial proportional odds models evaluated associations while adjusting for age, race, cardiovascular risk factors, and estradiol concentrations.
  • In age- and race-adjusted models, hot flashes were associated with significantly lower flow-mediated dilation (β = −1.01; SE, 0.41; P = 0.01), greater coronary artery calcification (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.12), and greater aortic calcification (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.19).
  • In fully adjusted models accounting for cardiovascular risk factors and estradiol, hot flashes remained significantly associated with reduced flow-mediated dilation (β = −0.97; SE, 0.44; P = 0.03) and elevated aortic calcification (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.49).

Study Design

Type

Cross-Sectional (n=492)

Structured PICO

Are menopausal hot flashes associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease in midlife women?

P
Population
492 women (35% black, 65% white) 45 to 58 years of age who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease and had a uterus and at least 1 ovary.
I
Intervention
Reported hot flashes (any in the previous 2 weeks).
C
Comparator
No reported hot flashes in the previous 2 weeks.
O
Outcome
Flow-mediated dilation (assessed by brachial artery ultrasound), coronary artery calcification, and aortic calcification (assessed by electron beam tomography).surrogate

Menopausal hot flashes are associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease, including reduced endothelial function and increased aortic calcification, suggesting they may serve as a marker for adverse vascular changes in midlife women.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 1.63 (95% CI 1.07-2.49)

Abstract

Background— Although evidence suggests adverse vascular changes among women with hot flashes, it is unknown whether hot flashes are associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to examine relations between menopausal hot flashes and indices of subclinical cardiovascular disease. We hypothesized that women with hot flashes would show reduced flow-mediated dilation and greater coronary artery and aortic calcification compared with women without hot flashes. Methods and Results— The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation Heart Study (2001 to 2003) is an ancillary study to the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation, a community-based cohort study. Participants were 492 women (35% black, 65% white) 45 to 58 years of age who were free of clinical cardiovascular disease and had a uterus and at least 1 ovary. Measures included a brachial artery ultrasound to assess flow-mediated dilation, electron beam tomography to assess coronary artery and aortic calcification, reported hot flashes (any/none, previous 2 weeks), and a blood sample for measurement of estradiol concentrations. Cross-sectional associations were evaluated with linear regression and partial proportional odds models. Hot flashes were associated with significantly lower flow-mediated dilation (β=−1.01; SE, 0.41; P =0.01) and greater coronary artery (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 2.12) and aortic (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 2.19) calcification in age- and race-adjusted models. Significant associations between hot flashes and flow-mediated dilation (β=−0.97; SE, 0.44; P =0.03) and aortic calcification (odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 2.49) remained in models adjusted for cardiovascular disease risk factors and estradiol. Conclusions— Women with hot flashes had reduced flow-mediated dilation and greater aortic calcification. Hot flashes may mark adverse underlying vascular changes among midlife women.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thurston et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Subclinical cardiovascular disease (n=492). Hot flashes vs. No hot flashes was evaluated on Aortic calcification (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.49). Menopausal hot flashes were associated with significantly lower flow-mediated dilation (β=-0.97; P=0.03) and greater aortic calcification (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.07-2.49) in midlife women.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0b3cf0393ef274532e1a94https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.776823
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Physiologically assessed hot flashes and endothelial function among midlife women2018 · 33 citations
  2. 2Physiologically assessed hot flashes and endothelial function among midlife women2017 · 60 citations
  3. 3History of hot flashes and aortic calcification among postmenopausal women2018 · 6 citations
  4. 4History of hot flashes and aortic calcification among postmenopausal women2010 · 69 citations
  5. 5Menopausal Hot Flashes and Carotid Intima Media Thickness Among Midlife Women2016 · 97 citations