PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1998Heart251 citationsOpen Access

Midodrine: a role in the management of neurocardiogenic syncope

CWChristopher R. WardSaint Luke's HospitalJGJoanne GrayNorthumbria UniversityJGJohn GilroyRoyal Victoria Infirmary

Structured PICO

Does midodrine improve symptom frequency and haemodynamic responses in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope?

P
Population
16 outpatients with neurocardiogenic syncope, frequent hypotensive symptoms (more than two syncopal episodes and fewer than 20 symptom free days per month), and reproducible syncope with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) during head up tilt. Mean age 56, 5 men.
I
Intervention
Midodrine for one month
C
Comparator
Placebo for one month
O
Outcome
Symptom frequency (symptom free days) and haemodynamic responses during head up tiltpatient reported

Midodrine significantly increases symptom-free days and improves quality of life in patients with frequent neurocardiogenic syncope.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefit of midodrine, an alpha agonist, on symptom frequency and haemodynamic responses during head up tilt in patients with neurocardiogenic syncope. SETTING: Cardiovascular investigation unit (a secondary and tertiary referral centre for the investigation and management of syncope). PATIENTS: 16 outpatients (mean (SD) age 56 (18) years; five men) with frequent hypotensive symptoms (more than two syncopal episodes and fewer than 20 symptom free days per month), and reproducible syncope with glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) during head up tilt. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: Randomised double blind placebo controlled study. Patients were randomised to receive either placebo or midodrine for one month. Symptom events were recorded during each study month. At the end of each study month patients completed a quality of life scoring scale (Short Form 36) and a global assessment of therapeutic response. They received GTN with head up tilt for measurement of heart rate (electrocardiography), phasic blood pressure (digital photoplethysmography), and thoracic fluid index (transthoracic impedance plethysmography) during symptom provocation. RESULTS: Patients administered midodrine had an average of 7.3 more symptom free days than those who received placebo (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.6 to 9; p < 0.0001). Eleven patients reported a positive therapeutic response with midodrine (p = 0.002). All domains of quality of life showed improvement with midodrine, in particular physical function (8.1; 95% CI 3.7 to 12.2), energy and vitality (14.6; 95% CI 7.3 to 22.1), and change in health status (22.2; 95% CI 11 to 33.4). Fourteen patients who were given placebo had tilt induced syncope compared with six given midodrine (p = 0.01). Baseline supine systolic blood pressure was higher and heart rate lower in patients who received midodrine than in those who were given placebo (p < 0.05). A lower thoracic fluid index in patients administered midodrine indicates increased venous return when supine and during head up tilt. There were no serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Midodrine had a conspicuous beneficial effect on symptom frequency, symptoms during head up tilt, and quality of life. Midodrine is recommended for the treatment of neurocardiogenic syncope in patients with frequent symptoms.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ward et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ba0e753c707319ec20806https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.79.1.45
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper