PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 5, 2016Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology224 citationsOpen Access

A randomized multicenter study evaluating Xolair persistence of response after long-term therapy

View Full Paper
DLDennis K. LedfordWBWilliam W. BusseBTBenjamin Trzaskoma

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few data are available to assist clinicians with decisions regarding long-term use of asthma therapies, including omalizumab. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the benefit and persistence of response in subjects continuing or withdrawing from long-term omalizumab treatment. METHODS: Evaluating the Xolair Persistency Of Response After Long-Term Therapy (XPORT) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study that included subjects with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma receiving long-term omalizumab. Subjects were randomized by using a hierarchical dynamic randomization scheme to continue their same dose of omalizumab or withdraw to placebo and were then followed every 4 weeks for 1 year. The primary outcome was any protocol-defined severe asthma exacerbation. The secondary outcome was time to first protocol-defined severe asthma exacerbation. Exploratory outcomes included changes in Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Control Test scores. RESULTS: Significantly more subjects in the omalizumab group (67%) had no protocol-defined exacerbation than in the placebo group (47.7%); an absolute difference of 19.3% (95% CI, 5.0%, 33.6%) represents a 40.1% relative difference. Time to first protocol-defined exacerbation analysis revealed a significantly different between-group exacerbation pattern that was consistent with the primary analysis. Subjects continuing omalizumab had significantly better asthma control (mean SD change from baseline to week 52: Asthma Control Test score, -1.16 4.14 vs placebo, -2.88 5.38, P = .0188; Asthma Control Questionnaire score, 0.22 0.66 vs placebo, 0.63 1.13, P = .0039). Discontinuation of omalizumab was associated with an increase in free IgE levels and an increase in basophil expression of the high-affinity IgE receptor. No safety concerns were noted. CONCLUSION: Continuation of omalizumab after long-term treatment results in continued benefit, as evidenced by improved symptom control and reduced exacerbation risk.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ledford et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0cf0e2f8c14364690ce631https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.08.054
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper