PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 2010The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing43 citations

Symptom Burden Clusters and Their Impact on Psychosocial Functioning Following Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

AAAmy A. AbbottSBSusan BarnasonLZLani Zimmerman

Key Result

Elderly patients with a moderate symptom burden cluster after coronary artery bypass surgery had significantly worse mental health functioning over 3 months compared to those with low symptom burden (P=0.02).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=226)

Structured PICO

How do symptom burden clusters at discharge impact psychosocial functioning over time in elderly patients following coronary artery bypass surgery?

P
Population
226 elderly patients following coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS)
I
Intervention
Symptom burden clusters (low, low-moderate, and moderate) at discharge
C
Comparator
Comparison between different symptom burden clusters
O
Outcome
Psychosocial functioning over time (baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months) using the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form subscalespatient reported

Identifying symptom burden clusters at discharge in elderly CABS patients can help clinicians recognize those at risk for delayed recovery and poor psychosocial functioning.

Main Result

p-value: p=0.02

Abstract

Although there is extensive literature on symptoms experienced by patients after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS), there is a paucity of data on symptom clusters and their impact on functional outcomes. The purpose of these descriptive, secondary analyses was to identify and describe cluster subgroups of 226 elderly CABS patients at discharge and to examine the cluster's impact on psychosocial functioning over time (baseline, 6 weeks, and 3 months) using the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form subscales. Cluster analysis revealed a 3-cluster solution with low, low-moderate, and moderate symptom burden clusters. Significant differences were detected for Duke Activity Status Index (F(2,223) = 5.12, P = .007), Barnason Efficacy Expectation Scale (F(2,223) = 9.60, P < .0001), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (F(2,219) = 15.14, P < .0001), and New York Heart Association classification (chi = 17.44, P = .008). Significant differences were noted on all variables between the low and moderate symptom burden clusters with differences between the low-moderate and moderate clusters for only the Barnason Efficacy Expectation Scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Those in the moderate symptom burden cluster had more symptoms, anxiety, and depression along with lower self-efficacy and physiological functioning than those in the other 2 clusters. There was no interaction or simple main effects for the role-emotional or social subscales as measured by the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form. There was no significant interaction for mental functioning by time and cluster (F(4,641) = .30, P = .88); however, there was a simple main effect for cluster (F(2,641) = 4.11, P = .02). Follow-up analysis indicated significant differences between the low and low-moderate clusters, indicating that those with low symptom burden had significantly better mental health functioning than those with moderate symptom burden. Findings provide a foundation of knowledge on symptom clusters in CABS populations and may be useful to clinicians to identify patients at risk for slowed or delayed recovery and for early intervention.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abbott et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS) (n=226). Symptom burden clusters was evaluated on Psychosocial functioning over time using the 36-item Medical Outcome Study Short Form subscales (p=0.02). Elderly patients with a moderate symptom burden cluster after coronary artery bypass surgery had significantly worse mental health functioning over 3 months compared to those with low symptom burden (P=0.02).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0dab589a2918c675a4f558https://doi.org/10.1097/jcn.0b013e3181cfbb46
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper