PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 15, 1974International Journal of Cancer138 citations

Statistical methods for the identification and use of prognostic factors

View Full Paper
PAP. ArmitageEGEdmund A. Gehan

Key Points

  • To review the rationale for identifying prognostic factors and examine statistical methods for incorporating them into the design and analysis of clinical studies.
  • Reviewed statistical methodology for identifying predictor variables across dichotomous, continuous, and time-to-event outcomes with censored observations.
  • Evaluated statistical adjustment techniques for clinical trial analysis, including subgroup stratification, analysis of covariance, and maximum likelihood estimation.
  • Examined applications across three illustrative oncology settings: breast cancer, prostate cancer, and Hodgkin's disease.
  • Identification of prognostic factors improves disease mechanism understanding, enables targeted patient stratification, and facilitates balanced treatment comparisons.
  • Adjustment techniques such as covariance analysis and maximum likelihood effectively reduce bias when defining control groups in non-randomized studies and refining trial analyses.
  • Framework applies broadly across varied predictor and response variable distributions to guide individualized therapy allocation.

Abstract

Abstract This is an expository paper which reviews the rationale for determining prognostic factors and the statistical methods for finding and allowing for such factors in the design and analysis of clinical studies. The delineation of prognostic factors in clinical studies is useful: in possibly providing insight into the mechanism of disease; in the determination of stratifications of patients for planning clinical trials; in facilitating the comparison between the outcomes of disease in different groups of patients; in assisting in the allocation of treatment to an individual patient and in permitting remedial action. A response variable is a measure of the future health or illness of the patient and its value is usually dependent on one or more prognostic variables. Statistical methodology for determining prognostic factors is reviewed for the case in which response is dichotomous, continuous or a measure of time (with the possibility of censored observations) and when the predictor variables are discrete or continuous (or a combination of both types). Methods of allowing for known prognostic variables in the analysis of a study are reviewed. These include: grouping of patients according to prognostic variables and comparing treatments separately within each group; covariance analysis and maximum likelihood. Knowledge of prognostic factors is useful in defining a control group which is to be compared with a treated group in non‐randomized studies. Three examples of studies designed to elucidate prognostic factors are described, one each in breast cancer, cancer of the prostate and Hodgkin's disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Armitage et al. (1974) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e38ab2a2e27e73427b639https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910130104
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Non-Randomized Controls in Cancer Clinical Trials1974 · 278 citations
  2. 2A comparison of the value of 200,000 I.U. of tetanus antitoxin (horse) with 10,000 I.U. in the treatment of tetanus1968 · 17 citations
  3. 3Clinical Evaluation in Breast Cancer1967 · 61 citations
  4. 4COMPARISON OF SURVIVAL CURVES, 1956 VERSUS 1962, IN CHILDREN WITH WILMS' TUMOR AND NEUROBLASTOMA1970 · 71 citations
  5. 5Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.1966 · 7,582 citations