PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2000IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging313 citations

A multiscale dynamic programming procedure for boundary detection in ultrasonic artery images

View Full Paper
QLQuan LiangIWInger WendelhagJWJohn Wikstrand

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop an automated boundary detection method for ultrasonic artery images to decrease interobserver variability and improve efficiency.
  • Developed a multiscale dynamic programming algorithm for boundary detection in artery images.

Structured PICO

Does an automated multiscale dynamic programming algorithm reduce interobserver variability and analysis time compared to manual tracing in ultrasonic artery images?

P
Population
Ultrasonic images of human carotid and femoral artery walls
I
Intervention
Automated boundary detection using a multiscale dynamic programming (DP) algorithm
C
Comparator
Manual tracing by human experts
O
Outcome
Interobserver variability and overall analysis time

An automated multiscale dynamic programming algorithm for boundary detection in ultrasonic artery images reduces interobserver variability and analysis time compared to manual tracing.

Abstract

Ultrasonic measurements of human carotid and femoral artery walls are conventionally obtained by manually tracing interfaces between tissue layers. The drawbacks of this method are the interobserver variability and inefficiency. In this paper, we present a new automated method which reduces these problems. By applying a multiscale dynamic programming (DP) algorithm, approximate vessel wall positions are first estimated in a coarse-scale image, which then guide the detection of the boundaries in a fine-scale image. In both cases, DP is used for finding a global optimum for a cost function. The cost function is a weighted sum of terms, in fuzzy expression forms, representing image features and geometrical characteristics of the vessel interfaces. The weights are adjusted by a training procedure using human expert tracings. Operator interventions, if needed, also take effect under the framework of global optimality. This reduces the amount of human intervention and, hence, variability due to subjectiveness. By incorporating human knowledge and experience, the algorithm becomes more robust. A thorough evaluation of the method in the clinical environment shows that interobserver variability is evidently decreased and so is the overall analysis time. We conclude that the automated procedure can replace the manual procedure and leads to an improved performance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liang et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10b81c63b25c787d9f5e32https://doi.org/10.1109/42.836372
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper