PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 26, 2004Journal of the American Geriatrics Society664 citations

Preparing Patients and Caregivers to Participate in Care Delivered Across Settings: The Care Transitions Intervention

View Full Paper
ECEric A. ColemanJSJodi D. SmithJFJanet C. Frank

Key Result

The Care Transitions Intervention significantly reduced 30-day rehospitalization compared to administrative controls (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28-0.96), with sustained reductions at 90 and 180 days.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=1,393)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does the Care Transitions Intervention reduce rehospitalization rates in community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older?

P
Population
1,393 community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older admitted to the study hospital with one of nine selected conditions (n=158 intervention, n=1,235 control).
I
Intervention
Care Transitions Intervention including tools to promote cross-site communication, encouragement to take an active role and assert preferences, continuity across settings, and guidance from a transition coach.
C
Comparator
Control subjects derived from administrative data.
O
Outcome
Rates of postdischarge hospital use (rehospitalization) at 30, 60, 90, and 180 days.hard clinical

A structured care transitions intervention involving a transition coach and patient empowerment significantly reduces rehospitalization rates in older adults up to 180 days post-discharge.

Main Result

Effect estimate: OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.28-0.96)

Limitations

  • Study population may lack diversity
  • Did not include patients at risk for transitions who are not acutely ill
  • Needs testing in more diverse populations
  • Needs testing in patients at risk for transitions who are not acutely ill

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test whether an intervention designed to encourage older patients and their caregivers to assert a more active role during care transitions can reduce rehospitalization rates. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental design whereby subjects receiving the intervention (n=158) were compared with control subjects derived from administrative data (n=1,235). SETTING: A large integrated delivery system in Colorado. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older admitted to the study hospital with one of nine selected conditions. INTERVENTION: Intervention subjects received tools to promote cross-site communication, encouragement to take a more active role in their care and assert their preferences, and continuity across settings and guidance from a transition coach. MEASUREMENTS: Rates of postdischarge hospital use at 30, 60, and 90 days. Intervention subjects' care experience was assessed using the care transitions measure. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio comparing rehospitalization of intervention subjects with that of controls was 0.52 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.28-0.96) at 30 days, 0.43 (95% CI=0.25-0.72) at 90 days, and 0.57 (95% CI=0.36-0.92) at 180 days. Intervention patients reported high levels of confidence in obtaining essential information for managing their condition, communicating with members of the healthcare team, and understanding their medication regimen. CONCLUSION: Supporting patients and caregivers to take a more active role during care transitions appears promising for reducing rates of subsequent hospitalization. Further testing may include more diverse populations and patients at risk for transitions who are not acutely ill.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Coleman et al. (2004) conducted an observational in Nine selected conditions (n=1,393). Care Transitions Intervention vs. Administrative data controls was evaluated on Rehospitalization at 30 days (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.96). The Care Transitions Intervention significantly reduced 30-day rehospitalization compared to administrative controls (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.28-0.96), with sustained reductions at 90 and 180 days.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12850392637892a9a6b8f7https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52504.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper