PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1999AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology17 citations

A novel heart failure model induced by sequential coronary artery occlusions and tachycardiac stress in awake pigs

View Full Paper
YSYou‐Tang ShenJLJoseph J. LynchRSRichard P. Shannon

Key Result

Serial myocardial infarctions followed by intermittent rapid ventricular pacing in pigs induced persistent hemodynamic impairment, including depressed LV dP/dt (-40%) and cardiac index (-30%).

Structured PICO

Does sequential coronary artery occlusion combined with tachycardiac stress induce a persistent heart failure model in awake pigs compared to pacing alone?

P
Population
15 conscious pigs implanted with aortic and atrial catheters, left ventricular (LV) pressure gauge, LV dimension crystals, ascending aortic flow probe, pacing leads, and two coronary artery occluders.
I
Intervention
Serial myocardial infarctions (initial distal LCX occlusion, followed 48h later by proximal LCX occlusion) combined with intermittent rapid ventricular pacing (220 beats/min for 7 days, off for 3 days, repeated for 3 cycles).
C
Comparator
6 conscious pigs subjected to pacing only.
O
Outcome
Persistence of impaired LV function and systemic hemodynamics (LV dP/dt, Vcf, CI, LV EDD, TPR, LAP) 3 weeks after cessation of the final pacing cycle.surrogate

Sequential coronary artery occlusions combined with intermittent rapid ventricular pacing in awake pigs creates a persistent heart failure model suitable for studying preclinical therapeutic interventions.

Abstract

A heart failure model was developed using conscious pigs subjected to serial myocardial infarctions followed by intermittent rapid ventricular pacing. Aortic and atrial catheters, left ventricular (LV) pressure gauge, LV dimension crystals, ascending aortic flow probe, pacing leads, and two coronary artery occluders were implanted in 15 pigs. The initial distal left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) occlusion produced a modest infarct, i.e., 18 +/- 3% of LV, and the second proximal LCX occlusion, performed 48 h later, enlarged the infarct to 33 +/- 2% of the LV with only modest changes in LV function. Thereafter, the pigs were subjected to ventricular pacing at 220 beats/min, which was maintained for 7 days and terminated for 3 days. This pacing cycle was repeated two more times and resulted in significantly impaired LV function and systemic hemodynamics. For example, after the second cycle of pacing, LV rate of pressure change (dP/dt, -41 +/- 4% from 2,778 +/- 112 mmHg/s), velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (V(cf): -53 +/- 6% from 1.1 +/- 0.1 s(-1)), and cardiac index (CI: -42 +/- 5% from 122 +/- 4 ml. min(-1). kg(-1)) were reduced significantly, whereas LV end-diastolic diameter (EDD: +34 +/- 6% from 39 +/- 2 mm), total peripheral resistance (TPR: +75 +/- 16% from 0.79 +/- 0.05 U), and mean left atrial pressure (LAP) (+21 +/- 1 mmHg from 5 +/- 1 mmHg) were increased significantly. Importantly, 3 wk after cessation of the final pacing cycle, LV dP/dt (-40 +/- 5%), V(cf) (-48 +/- 9%), and CI (-30 +/- 4%) remained depressed, whereas LV EDD (+39 +/- 5%), TPR (+43 +/- 9%), and LAP (+13 +/- 4 mmHg) were still increased. In contrast, hemodynamic impairment in six conscious pigs subjected to pacing only did not persist when pacing was terminated. Thus this model could provide a unique opportunity to study both the effects of preclinical therapeutic interventions and the mechanisms involved in the development of heart failure.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shen et al. (1999) studied Heart failure (n=21). Serial myocardial infarctions and intermittent rapid ventricular pacing vs. Pacing only was evaluated on Persistent hemodynamic impairment (LV dP/dt, Vcf, CI, LV EDD, TPR, LAP). Serial myocardial infarctions followed by intermittent rapid ventricular pacing in pigs induced persistent hemodynamic impairment, including depressed LV dP/dt (-40%) and cardiac index (-30%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1286d1a4bed3c7b16742b0https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1999.277.1.h388
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper