PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 10, 2022Heritage Science20 citationsOpen Access

Management effectiveness evaluation of world cultural landscape heritage: a case from China

JZJiami ZhouWWWenhui WangJZJianqin Zhou

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract World cultural landscape heritage (WCLH), recognized as a combination of cultural relics and natural landscapes with outstanding significance and universal value, is unique in terms of its differentiation from the deliberate human creativity of general cultural heritage and the “deartificialization” of natural heritage. To date, the management of WCLH has become increasingly standardized. However, with the prevalence of heritage resource development activities such as heritage tourism, the phenomenon of “urbanization”, “commercialization”, “artificialization” and other issues have gradually emerged in WCLH sites. Thus, the management issues of WCLH have become increasingly serious, leading to intense concerns about the unsustainable development of WCLH. Drawing inspirations from management effectiveness (ME) evaluation research of protected areas and acknowledging the uniqueness of WCLH, this study constructs a WCLH ME evaluation system consisting of four general criteria (management foundation, management system, management measures and management performance), 16 factors and 34 indicators. The evaluation system is applied and verified through an empirical study of five existing WCLH sites in China. The empirical results show that the ME of Chinese WCLH is at a “good” level. Specifically, the management of Chinese WCLH is overall impressive in indicators of management planning, heritage protection performance and economic performance but shows deficiency in indicators of protection fees, management infrastructure, management assessment, management institution, social performance, etc. Finally, this study discusses the management issues of respective heritage sites to provide suggestions and inspirations for the development, protection and management of the sites and other cultural landscapes in China and even the world.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12c5b7b761793c20c08683https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00660-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Indexing financial reporting information for heritage management2018 · 8 citations
  2. 2Reporting progress in protected areas : a site-level management effectiveness tracking tool2003 · 69 citations
  3. 3Strengthening the effectiveness of nature reserves in representing ecosystem services: The Yangtze River Economic Belt in China2020 · 62 citations
  4. 4Comparison and applications of methodologies for management effectiveness assessment of protected areas2010 · 14 citations
  5. 5Evaluating efficiencies and cost-effectiveness of best management practices in improving agricultural water quality using integrated SWAT and cost evaluation tool2019 · 102 citations