This paper provides a roadmap for the independent testing and public use of Structural Intelligence (SI). It does not introduce a new concept, equation, or domain extension. Instead, it organizes the existing SI instrument layer into a test-ready package for external readers, researchers, practitioners, critics, and institutions. Structural Intelligence began as a philosophical and diagnostic framework for distinguishing coherence from contact and appearance from answerability. Across the later corpus, it has been developed into a kernel, grammar, executable runtime, external reader protocol, predictive dashboard, transition discipline, downgrade rules, output states, anti-theater safeguards, and falsification ledger. These developments make SI more than an author-dependent interpretive lens and prepare it for independent application and critique. The paper clarifies what has already been made test-ready, what remains unvalidated, and what would count as progress or failure. It argues that SI cannot become scientifically or publicly mature through authorial fluency alone. It must become answerable to the same conditions it applies elsewhere: contact, correction, burden, falsification, recurrence, and repair. The contribution is meta-methodological. It shows how SI can move from a privately authored framework toward distributed public use without pretending that such maturation has already occurred. In plain language: SI has the grammar. Now it needs contact.
Vladisav Jovanovic (2026) studied this question.