PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 26, 2026Discusiones Filosóficas0 citationsOpen Access

Intentionality, constitution, and the suspension of the in-itself: Husserlian critique of the metaphysical supremacy of the object and the subject

View Full Paper
JSJuan Guillermo Mansilla SepúlvedaRARosaura Sánchez AguilarCLCruz Garcí­a Lirios

Key Points

  • The critique aims to expose errors in epistemology arising from illegitimately merging ontological regions.
  • Analysis of Husserl's ideas on phenomenological reduction and intentional dynamics of constitution.
  • Discussion of metaphysical implications of bracketing the notion of transcendent reality.
  • Comparison between traditional metaphysical perspectives and phenomenological approaches.
  • Demonstrates that world and objectivity are constituted through consciousness, not merely independent entities.
  • Establishes that both subjectivity and objectivity lack supremacy as they co-constitute experience.
  • Critiques traditional metaphysics, suggesting a new framework for understanding experience in a rigorous scientific context.

Abstract

In Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Husserl maintains that the fundamental errors of epistemology originate in an illegitimate metábasis between ontological regions, as occurs in psychologism, anthropologism, and biologism. In contrast to these positions, phenomenology proposes a radical purification of experience through phenomenological reduction, which makes it possible to access the transcendental region of consciousness and its intentional dynamics of constitution. From this perspective, the appearing of beings does not necessarily presuppose the existence of an in-itself object independent of all experience, without thereby denying it. Rather, the hypothesis of an absolutely transcendent reality is bracketed as an excess beyond possible knowledge. The world and objectivity do not present themselves as self-sufficient realities nor as mere subjective projections, but as correlates constituted within the intentionality of consciousness. In this way, Husserl does not simply invert the traditional hierarchy between subject and object; instead, he dissolves their purported metaphysical supremacy, showing that there is no sense of world or objectivity without the subjective dimension, nor transcendental subjectivity without objective correlation. This position constitutes a profound critique of traditional metaphysics and redefines the conditions of possibility for a rigorous science of experience.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sepúlveda et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1537bab5d9c58d83e8c110https://doi.org/10.17151/difil.2025.26.47.2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper