PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 24, 2022The Lancet Regional Health - Southeast Asia82 citationsOpen Access

Hypertension control rate in India: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level non-interventional studies, 2001–2022

SKShaffi Fazaludeen KoyaZPZarin PilakkadavathPCPraseeda Chandran

Key Result

Hypertension control among patients in India was achieved in 17.5% (14.3%-20.6%) of individuals between 2001 and 2020, with an increase to 22.5% during 2016-2020.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=338,313)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

P
Population
338,313 hypertensive patients from 51 community-based, non-interventional studies in India
O
Outcome
Hypertension control rate (proportion of patients with systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg)surrogate

Less than one-fourth of hypertensive patients in India had their blood pressure under control during 2016-2020, highlighting a significant gap in cardiovascular risk management.

Limitations

  • Very few studies have examined the lifestyle risk factors and social determinants relevant to hypertension control in India.
  • Very few studies reported data on social determinants or lifestyle risk factors

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a significant contributor to mortality in India. Achieving better hypertension control rate at the population level is critical in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Methods: Hypertension control rate was defined as the proportion of patients with their blood pressure under control (systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure <90 mmHg). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based, non-interventional studies published after 2001 that reported hypertension control rates. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, and grey literature, and extracted data using a common framework, and summarized the study characteristics. We conducted random-effects meta-analysis using untransformed hypertension control rates and reported the overall summary estimates and subgroup estimates of control rates as percentages and 95% confidence intervals. We also conducted mixed-effects meta-regression with sex, region, and study period as covariates. The risk of bias was assessed, and level of evidence was summarized using SIGN-50 methodology. The protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021267973. Findings: The systematic review included 51 studies (n = 338,313 hypertensive patients). 21 studies (41%) reported poorer control rates among males than females, and six studies (12%) reported poorer control rates among rural patients. The pooled hypertension control rate in India during 2001-2020 was 17.5% (95% CI: 14.3%-20.6%)-with significant increase over the years, reaching 22.5% (CI: 16.9-28.0%) in 2016-2020. Sub-group analysis showed significantly better control rates in the South and West regions, and significantly poorer control rates among males. Very few studies reported data on social determinants or lifestyle risk factors. Interpretation: Less than one-fourth of hypertensive patients in India had their blood pressure under control during 2016-2020. Although the control rate has improved compared to previous years, substantial differences exist across regions. Very few studies have examined the lifestyle risk factors and social determinants relevant to hypertension control in India. The country needs to develop and evaluate sustainable, community-based strategies and programs to improve hypertension control rates. Funding: Not applicable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koya et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypertension (n=338,313). Hypertension control among patients in India was achieved in 17.5% (14.3%-20.6%) of individuals between 2001 and 2020, with an increase to 22.5% during 2016-2020.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1616b9b15b679967195fc4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100113
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Population-level hypertension control rate in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis of community based non-interventional studies, 2001-20202022 · 4 citations
  2. 2Hypertension Control Cascade and Regional Performance in India: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Analysis (2015-2021)2023 · 42 citations
  3. 3Patient compliance, comorbidities, and challenges in the management of hypertension in India2022 · 3 citations
  4. 4Awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in adults aged 45 years and over and their spouses in India: A nationally representative cross-sectional study2021 · 96 citations
  5. 5Hypertension awareness, treatment, and control and their association with healthcare access in the middle-aged and older Indian population: A nationwide cohort study2022 · 80 citations