What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to explore the concepts of justice and equality in Alavi thought and their relation to international human rights instruments and the Iranian constitution.

May 27, 2026Islamic Wisdom and Law حکمت اسلامی و حقوق0 citationsOpen Access

A Comparative Study of Justice and Equality in Alavi Thought and International Human Rights Instruments with Emphasis on the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran

View Full Paper

IMIman Mohammadi FEFatemeh Enteshari

Key Points

This study aims to explore the concepts of justice and equality in Alavi thought and their relation to international human rights instruments and the Iranian constitution.
Comparative and analytical approach used to examine Alavi thought, international human rights instruments, and the Iranian constitution.
Analysis focuses on the foundational principles of justice and equality as presented in the noted sources.
Alavi thought defines justice based on divine and ethical principles, while international documents focus on secular and universal bases.
Both sources emphasize human dignity and the elimination of discrimination, showcasing common ground despite differing foundations.
The Iranian constitution presents a combined approach, potentially facilitating justice-oriented development and equitable governance.

Abstract

عدالت و مساوات به‌عنوان دو اصل بنیادین در اندیشه علوی، جایگاه ویژه‌ای در نهج‌البلاغه دارند و به‌عنوان مبنای حکمرانی مطلوب اسلامی معرفی شده‌اند. از طرفی، اسناد بین‌المللی حقوق بشر، به‌ویژه اعلامیه جهانی ۱۹۴۸ و میثاقین ۱۹۶۶، بر برابری و عدم تبعیض به‌عنوان اصولی جهانی تأکید دارند. قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران نیز با الهام از تعالیم اسلامی و در تعامل با معیارهای جهانی، اصول متعددی را به عدالت اجتماعی و مساوات اختصاص داده است. پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از روش تطبیقی و تحلیلی، به بررسی وجوه اشتراک و افتراق میان سه منبع مذکور می‌پردازد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد در حالی‌که اندیشه علوی، عدالت را بر پایه مبانی الهی و اخلاقی تبیین می‌کند، اسناد بین‌المللی بیشتر بر مبانی سکولار و جهان‌شمول استوار هستند. با این حال، هر دو منبع در تأکید بر کرامت انسانی و رفع تبعیض هم‌سو می‌باشند. قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران با تلفیق این دو دیدگاه، الگویی ترکیبی ارائه می‌دهد که می‌تواند زمینه‌ساز توسعه عدالت‌محور و حکمرانی عادلانه در زمان کنونی باشد.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mohammadi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168a340c924ddd1bd58d20 https://doi.org/10.71844/iwl.2026.1233914

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper

May 27, 2026Islamic Wisdom and Law حکمت اسلامی و حقوق0 citationsOpen Access

A Comparative Study of Justice and Equality in Alavi Thought and International Human Rights Instruments with Emphasis on the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran

View Full Paper

IMIman Mohammadi FEFatemeh Enteshari

Key Points

This study aims to explore the concepts of justice and equality in Alavi thought and their relation to international human rights instruments and the Iranian constitution.
Comparative and analytical approach used to examine Alavi thought, international human rights instruments, and the Iranian constitution.
Analysis focuses on the foundational principles of justice and equality as presented in the noted sources.
Alavi thought defines justice based on divine and ethical principles, while international documents focus on secular and universal bases.
Both sources emphasize human dignity and the elimination of discrimination, showcasing common ground despite differing foundations.
The Iranian constitution presents a combined approach, potentially facilitating justice-oriented development and equitable governance.

Abstract

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mohammadi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a168a340c924ddd1bd58d20 https://doi.org/10.71844/iwl.2026.1233914

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper