PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Zero-Parameter Prediction for the Baryonic Tully–Fisher Relation from the Golden-Ratio Gravitational Closure

View Full Paper
JHJames P Higginson

Key Points

  • This research aims to provide a parameterless prediction for the baryonic Tully–Fisher relation using a modified gravitational framework.
  • Tested the ESD gravitational closure against 129 filtered SPARC galaxies using rotation-curve-derived Newtonian accelerations.
  • Measured residuals and biases compared to MOND predictions, evaluating scaling relation slopes.
  • The ESD produces a residual RMS of 0.268 dex, improving the fit over MOND's 0.283 dex by 5.3%.
  • The mean residual of ESD is −0.017 dex, indicating no bias, while MOND shows +0.103 dex.
  • Predicted BTFR slope of α ≈ 3.84 by ESD is closer to the observed α = 3.75 ± 0.11 than MOND’s 4.

Abstract

The baryonic Tully–Fisher relation (BTFR), Mb ∝ V 4f , is one of the tightest empirical scalinglaws in extragalactic astronomy, yet its origin remains debated. We show that the Energy–Space–Displacement (ESD) gravitational closure—a parameterless modification of Newtonian dynamicsin which every constant is fixed by the golden ratio φ and its logarithm—yields a specific BTFRprediction with a mass-dependent prefactor G(u) that is absent in the deep-MOND limit. Testingthis prediction against 129 quality-filtered SPARC galaxies using rotation-curve-derived Newtonianaccelerations, we find: (i) the ESD achieves a residual RMS of 0.268 dex versus 0.283 dex for thedeep-MOND prediction, a 5.3% reduction in scatter with zero free parameters; (ii) the ESD meanresidual is −0.017 dex (consistent with zero bias), compared to +0.103 dex for MOND; (iii) the ESDpredicts an effective BTFR slope of α ≈ 3.84 through the mass-dependent tilt factor G(u), closerto the observed α = 3.75 ± 0.11 than MOND’s exact 4; and (iv) G correlates with baryonic mass(1.01–3.57 across the SPARC range), providing a testable surface-brightness-dependent signaturethat may help distinguish the ESD from MOND.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

James P Higginson (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17dc9d3fad632b0f9d9436https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20400008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper