PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 2026Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative language performance in children and adolescents with 22q11.2ds syndrome and down syndrome

EMEsther Moraleda-SepúlvedaUniversidad Complutense de MadridMLMiguel Lázaro-López-VillaseñorUniversidad Complutense de MadridNPNoelia Pulido-GarcíaUniversidad Complutense de Madrid

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare language performance between children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and those with Down syndrome.
  • Participants included 40 children with 22q11.2DS and 40 with Down syndrome, matched for age and cognitive ability.
  • Standardized assessments used were CELF-5 and BLOC-C for evaluating language skills.
  • Group differences and associations with age were analyzed to assess syndrome-specific language profiles.
  • Children with 22q11.2DS had stronger receptive vocabulary and syntax skills compared to the DS group.
  • The DS group exhibited lower performance across language domains, particularly in morphosyntax.
  • Moderate positive associations between vocabulary and age were noted in the 22q11.2DS group, whereas the DS group showed limited age-related language gains.

Abstract

Abstract Genetically defined neurodevelopmental syndromes provide a framework for examining constraints on language development. This study compared language performance in children and adolescents with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS; n = 40) and Down syndrome (DS; n = 40), matched for age and nonverbal cognitive ability, aged 6–16 years. Standardized assessments included the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF-5) and the BLOC-C to evaluate multiple receptive and expressive language domains. Group differences, effect sizes, and associations with age were analyzed to characterize syndrome-specific profiles. Children with 22q11.2DS demonstrated relatively stronger receptive vocabulary and syntax alongside weaker morphosyntactic and pragmatic skills, with vocabulary showing moderate positive associations with age. In contrast, the DS group exhibited generally lower performance across domains, with pronounced difficulties in morphosyntax and limited age-related gains. These findings highlight differences in overall level of performance and relative strengths within a globally impaired profile across syndromes and emphasize the value of multi-dimensional assessment in capturing both age-related patterns and vulnerabilities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moraleda-Sepúlveda et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17dd723fad632b0f9da21fhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-026-09701-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper