PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 28, 20260 citationsOpen Access

COCM Among Oscillatory Cosmologies: A Discriminant Based on Frequency Fixation and Observable Space

View Full Paper
JGJosé Luis Vázquez González

Key Points

  • This research aims to position the Concentric Orbital Cosmological Model (COCM) within the landscape of oscillatory cosmologies based on its frequency fixation and observable space.
  • Identified oscillatory signals in cosmological data across different analyses.
  • Established a fixed frequency for oscillations before data fitting.
  • Compared structural features of COCM with other oscillatory cosmological models.
  • COCM demonstrates a fixed oscillation frequency of ωz = 11.1991, distinguishing it from alternatives.
  • The COCM’s approach contributes to a methodologically distinct class among oscillatory cosmologies, allowing for falsifiable predictions.
  • Evidence of oscillations in H(z) space rather than in other parameters solidifies COCM's unique status.

Abstract

The Concentric Orbital Cosmological Model (COCM) predicts an oscillatory modulation of the Hubble rate H(z) at fixed frequency ωz = 11.1991. Several independent analyses have reported oscillatory signals in cosmological data, including oscillations in the cosmic scale factor (Ringermacher–Mead), in AGN redshifts (Wheeler/OzDES), and in the dark energy equation of state w(z). This paper identifies the methodological position of the COCM among these alternatives. The discriminant is not merely the presence or absence of oscillations, but two structural features: the oscillation frequency is fixed from first principles prior to data fitting, and the oscillation operates in H(z) space rather than in w(z) or the scale factor. These two features jointly place the COCM in a methodologically distinct class among the oscillatory cosmologies considered here, with a falsifiable prediction that does not depend on any phenomenologically chosen periodicity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

José Luis Vázquez González (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a17ddab3fad632b0f9da6f2https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20390495
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Observational Discriminant Between COCM and Alternative Dark Energy Models: A Comparison Using DESI DR2 and Cosmic Chronometer Data2026
  2. 2COCM as a Bounded Effective Sector: Predictive Structure, Observational Underdetermination, and the Epistemic Meaning of Confirmation and Non-Confirmation2026
  3. 3Evidence for a periodic modulation of H(z) independent of dynamical dark energy in DESI DR2 data2026
  4. 4A periodic oscillatory parametrisation of H(z): fits to DESI DR1 and DR2, comparison with w0waCDM, and mock-catalogue validation2026
  5. 5COCM: correction of the Hubble tension claim, low-redshift oscillatory structure prediction, and robustness analyses2026