PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 3, 2005Circulation367 citationsOpen Access

Randomized Comparison of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Standard Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Diabetic Patients

View Full Paper
MSManel SabatéPJPilar Jiménez‐QuevedoDADominick J. Angiolillo

Key Result

Sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduced in-segment late lumen loss compared to standard stents in diabetic patients (0.06 mm vs 0.47 mm; P<0.001).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=160)

Randomization

Stratified by diabetes treatment status

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does sirolimus-eluting stent implantation reduce in-segment late lumen loss in diabetic patients with de novo coronary stenoses compared to standard stents?

P
Population
160 diabetic patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries
I
Intervention
Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation
C
Comparator
Standard stent implantation
O
Outcome
In-segment late lumen loss as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography at 9-month follow-upsurrogate

Sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduce angiographic late lumen loss and clinical restenosis events compared to standard stents in diabetic patients.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 0.06% vs 0.47%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in diabetic patients are shadowed by the increased rate of recurrence compared with nondiabetic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to demonstrate the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with standard stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. The primary end point of the trial was in-segment late lumen loss as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography at 9-month follow-up. The trial was stratified by diabetes treatment status. One hundred sixty patients were randomized to sirolimus-eluting stents (80 patients; 111 lesions) or standard stent implantation (80 patients; 110 lesions). On average, reference diameter was 2.34+/-0.6 mm, lesion length was 15.0+/-8 mm, and 13.1% of lesions were chronic total occlusions. In-segment late lumen loss was reduced from 0.47+/-0.5 mm for standard stents to 0.06+/-0.4 mm for sirolimus stents (P<0.001). Target-lesion revascularization and major adverse cardiac event rates were significantly lower in the sirolimus group (31.3% versus 7.3% and 36.3% versus 11.3%, respectively; both P<0.001). Non-insulin- and insulin-requiring patients demonstrated similar reductions in angiographic and clinical parameters of restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. During the 9-month follow-up, stent thrombosis occurred in 2 patients after standard stent implantation. Conversely, this phenomenon was not seen in the sirolimus stent group. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial demonstrated that sirolimus stent implantation is safe and efficacious in reducing both angiographic and clinical parameters of restenosis compared with standard stents in diabetic patients with de novo coronary stenoses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sabaté et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Diabetic patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries (n=160). Sirolimus-eluting stent vs. Standard stent was evaluated on In-segment late lumen loss (p=<0.001). Sirolimus-eluting stents significantly reduced in-segment late lumen loss compared to standard stents in diabetic patients (0.06 mm vs 0.47 mm; P<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1836948008e5848e6f87b3https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.105.562421
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper