PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Journal of Clinical Oncology0 citations

Optimal timing of endocrine therapy interruption for pregnancy in young women with hormone receptor–positive early breast cancer.

View Full Paper
FJFloriane JochumAHAnne‐Sophie HamyKWKerollos Wanis

Key Points

  • To determine the effect of timing for interrupting endocrine therapy on breast cancer recurrence risk during pregnancy attempts in young women.
  • Emulated two trials using French National Health Data System among women aged ≤42 years with early-stage HR+ breast cancer diagnosed between 2011-2020.
  • Trial 1 compared ET interruption at 18-30 months with uninterrupted ET for ≥24 months, enrolling 10,835 women.
  • Trial 2 analyzed nine ET-interruption windows (6-month intervals) against uninterrupted ET for ≥24 or ≥60 months, with 22,916 women included.
  • In Trial 1, ET interruption at 18-30 months had a 5-year BC event risk of 17.2%, compared to 16.0% with uninterrupted ET (risk difference 1.2, 95% CI −0.7 to 3.1).
  • In high-risk women, interruption increased risk by 5.8 percentage points (95% CI 1.8 to 10.0).
  • Earlier ET interruption (6-12 months) raised the risk by 8.3 percentage points compared to uninterrupted ET for ≥24 months.

Abstract

627 Background: The POSITIVE trial showed that temporary interruption of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) after 18–30 months to attempt pregnancy did not increase short-term recurrence risk in young women with hormone receptor–positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). However, whether this effect varies by baseline recurrence risk and the timing of interruption remains uncertain. Methods: Using the French National Health Data System (SNDS), we emulated two target trials among women aged ≤42 years with early-stage HR+ BC diagnosed between 2011 and 2020. Trial 1 emulated the POSITIVE design, comparing ET interruption at 18–30 months with uninterrupted ET for ≥24 months. Trial 2 compared nine ET-interruption windows (6-month intervals) with uninterrupted ET for ≥24 or ≥60 months. The primary endpoint was the 5-year risk of BC events. Analyses used a clone–censor–weight approach with marginal structural models. Results: In Trial 1 (n = 10,835), ET interruption at 18–30 months was associated with a 5-year BC event risk of 17.2%, compared with 16.0% for uninterrupted ET ≥24 months (risk difference, 1.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −0.7 to 3.1). Risk varied by baseline recurrence risk: interruption had minimal impact in low- or intermediate-risk women (risk difference, −0.6 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.7 to 1.6) but increased risk in high-risk women (risk difference, 5.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.8 to 10.0). In Trial 2 (n = 22,916), earlier ET interruption was associated with higher 5-year BC risk, which decreased with longer prior ET duration. Compared with uninterrupted ET ≥24 months, interruption at 6–12 months increased risk by 8.3 percentage points, whereas interruption at 24–30 months increased risk by 2.7 percentage points. Low- or intermediate-risk women showed comparable risk when interruption occurred at 24–30 months, whereas high-risk women required ≥36–42 months of ET to achieve similar safety. Among pregnancy-seeking women, 64% conceived, and 47% resumed ET. Conclusions: The oncologic impact of temporary ET interruption depends on baseline recurrence risk and prior ET duration. Interruption after 24 months appears safe for low- or intermediate-risk women, whereas high-risk patients may benefit from delaying interruption to at least 36 months. These findings support a risk-adapted approach to fertility counseling.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jochum et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e18fab5b468c4417177https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.627
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper