PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 29, 2026Case Reports in Orthopedics0 citationsOpen Access

Bisphosphonate‐Associated Atypical Femoral Fractures: A Description of Surgical Techniques in the Revision Fixation Setting With an Emphasis on Avoiding Varus Malalignment: A Two—Case Report

View Full Paper
ATAaron Jose ThomasBMBen MurphyCHConor Hurson

Key Points

  • This report aims to describe surgical techniques for addressing atypical femoral fractures caused by bisphosphonate therapy, focusing on avoiding malalignment.
  • Two cases of atypical femoral fractures in patients with a history of bisphosphonate use were analyzed.
  • Surgical interventions included bilateral internal fixation and valgus corrections for nonunions.
  • Techniques emphasized maintaining a medial entry point to optimize fracture stability.
  • Case 1: Bilateral internal fixation successfully addressed simultaneous atypical femoral fractures with subsequent valgus correction for nonunion.
  • Case 2: Initial fixation led to nonunion, but revision with valgus correction improved mechanical stability and reduced complication risks.

Abstract

Introduction Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are insufficiency fractures of the lateral femoral cortex and represent a rare but significant complication of long‐term bisphosphonate or denosumab therapy. Our report explores the surgical techniques utilised to avoid varus malalignment in these two complex cases, both of which fulfilled the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) criteria for AFFs. Case Presentation Case 1 presents a woman in her early 60s with over 8 years of bisphosphonate use, who developed simultaneous AFFs. She underwent bilateral internal fixation with cephalomedullary nails. This was followed by revision surgery and a valgus correction for right femoral fracture nonunion. Case 2 presents a man in his late 60s with prior exposure to bisphosphonates and denosumab (< 7 years), who sustained a left AFF. Initial cephalomedullary nailing was complicated by nonunion and hardware failure, necessitating revision with a valgus correction. Conclusion Our cases emphasise the importance of recognising symptoms during follow‐up assessments and provide a detailed account of the surgical techniques employed in the revision fixation of AFFs, with a particular emphasis on achieving valgus alignment, maintaining a medial entry point and avoiding varus malalignment to optimise mechanical stability, reduce the risk of postoperative nonunion and promote fracture healing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Thomas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a192e39fab5b468c44172e0https://doi.org/10.1155/cro/9413435
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper