PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 15, 2003Circulation162 citations

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improves Heart Rate Variability in Patients with Symptomatic Heart Failure

View Full Paper
PAPhilip B. AdamsonKKKaren J. KlecknerWVWarren L. VanHout

Key Result

Cardiac resynchronization therapy significantly improved heart rate variability compared to therapy-off (148±47 ms vs 118±45 ms; P=0.02) in patients with symptomatic heart failure.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=50)

Structured PICO

Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve heart rate variability in patients with moderate to severe symptomatic heart failure?

P
Population
50 patients with moderate to severe symptomatic heart failure implanted with the InSync biventricular pacing system
I
Intervention
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) turned on (therapy-on)
C
Comparator
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) turned off (therapy-off)
O
Outcome
Heart rate variability (HRV) computed as the standard deviation of the atrial cycle length over 2 months of continuous monitoringsurrogate

Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves heart rate variability in patients with symptomatic heart failure, suggesting a favorable shift in autonomic balance.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 148% vs 118%

p-value: p=0.02

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing improves symptoms and functional capacity in patients with moderate to severe heart failure. The present study examined whether an improvement in ventricular performance from resynchronization therapy changes the autonomic control of heart rate. METHODS AND RESULTS: Heart rate variability (HRV) was examined in 50 patients implanted with the InSync biventricular pacing system who were randomized to therapy-on (n=25) or therapy-off (n=25). HRV was computed as the standard deviation of the atrial cycle length sensed from the system over 2 months of continuous monitoring. HRV was compared between CRT-on and CRT-off groups. HRV was higher in patients randomized to CRT-on compared with CRT-off (148+/-47 ms for CRT-on versus 118+/-45 ms for CRT-off; P=0.02), despite the lack of difference in mean atrial cycle length (844+/-129 ms for CRT-on versus 851+/-110 ms for CRT-off; P=0.82). Changes in plasma catecholamines were not different between the CRT-on and CRT-off groups from baseline to the 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in ventricular performance from CRT shifts cardiac autonomic balance toward a more favorable profile that is less dependent on sympathetic activation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Adamson et al. (2003) conducted an RCT in Symptomatic heart failure (n=50). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-on) vs. CRT-off was evaluated on Heart rate variability (standard deviation of the atrial cycle length) (p=0.02). Cardiac resynchronization therapy significantly improved heart rate variability compared to therapy-off (148±47 ms vs 118±45 ms; P=0.02) in patients with symptomatic heart failure.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a193b30014c469faf57e354https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000083368.75831.7a
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart Failure2002 · 4,609 citations
  2. 2Plasma Norepinephrine as a Guide to Prognosis in Patients with Chronic Congestive Heart Failure1984 · 3,137 citations
  3. 3Hormones regulating cardiovascular function in patients with severe congestive heart failure and their relation to mortality. CONSENSUS Trial Study Group.1990 · 1,157 citations
  4. 4Do Increases in Markers of Vagal Activity Imply Protection From Sudden Death?1995 · 84 citations
  5. 5The neurohormonal hypothesis: A theory to explain the mechanism of disease progression in heart failure1992 · 1,058 citations