PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1979American Anthropologist387 citations

Formality and Informality in Communicative Events

View Full Paper
JIJudith T. Irvine

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This paper examines the analytical utility of the concept of “formality” in social‐cultural anthropology, particularly the ethnography of communication. A survey of literature indicates that “formality” actually incorporates several distinct descriptive dimensions that do not necessarily correlate. Separating these dimensions facilitates the comparison of social occasions, viewed in terms of their communicational structure. The occasions compared here are political meetings among Wolof (Senegal), Mursi (Ethiopia), and Ilongots (Philippines). It is suggested that formality in communicative events can serve not only the force of tradition or the coercive power of a political establishment, but also creativity and change. formality, political meetings, ethnography of communication, sociolinguistics, situational analysis

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Judith T. Irvine (1979) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a195e22214a3f02e0d9581fhttps://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1979.81.4.02a00020
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper