PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 1977Heart47 citationsOpen Access

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular filling after mitral valve surgery.

MSMartin G. St. John SuttonTTThomas A. TraillAGAdil S. Ghafour

Structured PICO

Does echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular filling differentiate the functional effects of various mitral valve surgeries?

P
Population
14 normal subjects and 129 patients after mitral valve surgery (including 14 with mitral stenosis, 67 with mitral prostheses, 30 with mitral valve repair, and 18 with valve malfunction).
I
Intervention
Mitral valve surgery (including mitral valvotomy, mitral prostheses [Björk-Shiley, Hancock, Starr-Edwards], and mitral valve repair)
C
Comparator
Normal subjects and pre-operative baseline (for mitral stenosis patients)
O
Outcome
Peak rate of increase of left ventricular dimension (dD/dt) and duration of rapid filling measured by echocardiographysurrogate

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular filling is a valuable non-invasive method for comparing different mitral valve operative procedures and diagnosing valve malfunction.

Abstract

In order to investigate the functional effects of mitral valve surgery, echocardiograms showing left ventricular dimension were recorded and digitised in 14 normal subjects and 129 patients after mitral valve surgery. Measurements were made of peak rate of increase of dimension (dD/dt) and duration of rapid filling, studies on left ventriculograms in 36 patients having shown close correlation between these values and changes in cavity volume. In 14 patients with mitral stenosis, peak dD/dt was reduced to 7-2 +/ 1-5 cm/s, and filling period prolonged to 330 +/- 65 ms, compared with normal (16-0 +/- 3-2 cm/s, and 160 +/- 50 ms, respectively), and after mitral valvotomy, these values improved significantly (10-4 +/- 2-7 cm/s and 245 +/- 55 ms). Characteristic abnormalities were found in 67 patients with mitral prostheses. Values for the Björk-Shiley (10-5 +/- 4-2 cm/s and 180 +/- 80 ms) and Hancock (10-3 +/- 3-7 cm/s, 245 +/- 80 ms) values were similar, and both superior to the Starr-Edwards (7-4 +/- 3-0 cm/s, 295 +/- 105 ms). Results after mitral valve repair in 30 cases were not significantly different from normal (14-4 +/- 5-0 cm/s, 170 +/- 50 ms). Values outside the 95 per cent confidence limits for the valve in question allowed diagnosis of value malfunction in 18 cases. The method is value in comparing different operative procedures and in following up patients after mitral valve surgery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sutton et al. (1977) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a198236b1a1e919c38903d3https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.39.12.1283
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper