PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 1983IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems24 citations

Dynamic Thermal Line Ratings Part II Conductor Temperature Sensor and Laboratory Field test Evaluation

View Full Paper
SFStephen D. FossSLSheng H. LinHSH. Richard Stillwell

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

An outdoor laboratory test facility was utilized to evaluate the performance of the dynamic ampacity rating algorithm, developed in Part I, and a prototype conductor sensor module for measuring conductor surface temperature, conductor current and ambient air temperature. The test facility consisted of a fully instrumented outdoor mock conductor test loop and a real time data acquisition system. Both steady state and transient load tests were performed and analyzed under a wide variety of meteorological conditions. The ampacity predictions observed were consistent with laboratory test measurements. Cor- relations obtained between sensor module measurements and calibrated sensors was excellent over the intend- ed range of application of the sensor module.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Foss et al. (1983) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a19994c60e90a7f5fea7257https://doi.org/10.1109/tpas.1983.317796
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper