PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 20, 2004JAMA293 citations

Early vs Late Administration of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

View Full Paper
GMGilles MontalescotMBMaria BorentainLPLaurent Payot

Structured PICO

Does early administration of intravenous Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors improve culprit artery patency and mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI compared to late administration?

P
Population
931 acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) pooled from 6 randomized trials.
I
Intervention
Early intravenous administration of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab or tirofiban) at the point of initial contact (emergency department or ambulance) prior to transfer to the catheterization laboratory.
C
Comparator
Late intravenous administration of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab or tirofiban) at the time of PCI in the catheterization laboratory.
O
Outcome
Culprit artery patency evaluated by Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grades on admission and mortality.surrogate

Early administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors prior to primary PCI in STEMI improves initial coronary patency compared to administration at the time of PCI.

Limitations

  • Requires further evaluations in adequately powered large trials to confirm clinical benefit

Abstract

CONTEXT: Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (Gp IIb/IIIa) inhibitors improve myocardial reperfusion and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but optimal timing of administration remains unclear. No systematic reviews have comprehensively examined the effects of early vs delayed administration of these agents. OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis of randomized trials of early (prior to transfer to the catheterization laboratory) vs late (at the time of PCI) intravenous administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register search of the literature over the past 10 years; papers presented at major cardiac conferences; consultation with national and international colleagues as well as Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor drug manufacturers; and text and journal article bibliographies. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: We examined trials of randomized comparisons between early administration at the point of initial contact (emergency department or ambulance) and late administration (catheterization laboratory) of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI. Outcome data had to be available on both culprit artery patency evaluated by Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grades on admission and mortality. Two authors independently reviewed abstracts or complete articles. Six studies met inclusion criteria. Independent data extraction was performed by 2 reviewers and confirmed by consensus. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 6 trials enrolled 931 STEMI patients treated with abciximab (3 trials) or tirofiban (3 trials) in combination with primary PCI. TIMI grade 2 or 3 flow (41.7% 194/465 vs 29.8% [139/466) as well as TIMI grade 3 flow (20.3% 84/413 vs 12.2% 51/418) were significantly more frequent in the early group compared with the late group (odds ratio OR, 1.69; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.28-2.22; P<.001; and OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.26-2.71; P<.001, respectively). The early administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors was associated with a 28% reduction of mortality from 4.7% to 3.4%, which was not significant but consistent with similar trends for reinfarction and the composite ischemic end point. CONCLUSIONS: In a meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials, early administration of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors in STEMI appeared to improve coronary patency with favorable trends for clinical outcomes. These findings are supportive of a strategy of facilitated PCI. Further evaluations in adequately powered large trials are awaited to confirm the clinical benefit of this strategy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Montalescot et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a38ffa91637a39025d160https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.3.362
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper